
Utilidad diagnóstica de las escalas del desarrollo psicomotor en niños de 0 a 36 meses de edad. Revisión sistemática
Mora Verdugo Miriann Alexandra, Bermeo Rojas Karen Mariela, Ottati Aray Isaac Renato
Volumen 43 | N° 3 | Diciembre 2025 | Págs. 47-57 55
8.
da Silva FC, Gonçalves E, Valdivia Arancibia
BA, Bento GG, da Silva Castro TL, Soleman
Hernandez SS, et al. Estimadores de con-
sistencia interna en las investigaciones en
salud: el uso del coeciente alfa. Rev Peru
Med Exp Salud Publica. 2015;32(1):129–38.
doi:10.17843/rpmesp.2015.321.1585.
9.
Roco-Videla Á, Flores S, Olguín-Barraza M,
Maureira-Carsalade N. Alpha de Cronbach
y su intervalo de confianza. Nutr Hosp.
2024;41(1):270–271. doi:10.20960/nh.04961
10. Rivera-González R, Sánchez C, Corral-Guille
I, Figueroa M, Soler K, Martínez-Vázquez I,
et al. Edad de presentación de los reactivos
del Test de Denver II en niños de 0 a 4
años del Estado de Morelos. Salud Ment.
2013;36(6):459–70 [Internet]. Disponible en:
http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=s-
ci_arttext&pid=S0185-33252013000600003&l-
ng=es
11.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I,
Hoffmann T, Mulrow C, et al. The PRISMA 2020
statement: an updated guideline for reporting
systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
12.
Manterola C, Cartes-Velasquez R, Otzen T.
Instructions for using the MInCir scale to assess
methodological quality in diagnostic accuracy
studies. Int J Morphol. 2016;34(1):78–84. doi:
10.4067/S0717-95022016000100012
13.
Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A,
Gajewski B, Hróbjartsson A, et al. Guidelines
for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies
(GRRAS). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):96–106.
Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/21130355/
14.
Power M, Lawson A, Rutter H. Principles for
high-quality, high-value testing. BMJ Evid
Based Med. 2013;18(1):5–10. doi: 10.1136/
eb-2012-100645
15.
Baeyens JP, Serrien B, Goossens M, Clijsen
R. Questioning the “SPIN and SNOUT” rule in
clinical testing. Arch Physiother. 2019;9(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/s40945-019-0056-
16.
Trevethan R. Sensitivity, specificity, and
predictive values: Foundations, pliabilities,
and pitfalls in research and practice. Front
Public Health. 2017;5:307. doi: 10.3389/
fpubh.2017.00307
17. Bossuyt P, Cohen J, Gatsonis C, Korevaar D;
STARD Group. STARD 2020: Updated reporting
guidelines for all diagnostic accuracy studies.
BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71.
18.
Gudiel-Hermoza A, Gudiel-Hermoza J, Guillén-
Pinto D. Adaptación, validación y puntos de
corte del Cuestionario de Edades y Etapas,
3ª edición (ASQ-3), en español, en una zona
urbana de Lima-Perú. Rev Neuropsiquiatr.
2021;84(2):83–93. doi: 10.20453/rnp.
v84i2.3995
19.
Limbos M, Joyce D. Comparison of the ASQ
and PEDS in screening for developmental delay
in children presenting for primary care. J Dev
Behav Pediatr [Internet]. 2011;32(7):499–511.
doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31822552e9
20.
Simpson S, D’Aprano A, Tayler C, Khoo ST,
Highfold R. Validation of a culturally adapted
developmental screening tool for Australian
Aboriginal children: Early ndings and next
steps. Early Hum Dev. 2016;103:91–5.
doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.08.005
21.
Schonhaut L, Pérez M, Armijo I, Maturana
A. Comparison between Ages & Stages
Questionnaire and Bayley Scales to predict
cognitive delay in school age. Early Hum
Dev. 2020;141:104933. doi: 10.1016/j.
earlhumdev.2019.104933
22. Yue A, Jiang Q, Wang B, Abbey C, Medina A,
Shi Y, et al. Concurrent validity of the Ages and
Stages Questionnaire and the Bayley Scales
of Infant Development III in China. PLoS One.
2019;14(9):e0221675. doi: 10.1371/journal.
pone.0221675
23.
Duggan C, Irvine A, Hourihane J, Kiely M, Murray
D. ASQ-3 and BSID-III’s concurrent validity
and predictive ability of cognitive outcome at
5 years. Pediatr Res. 2023;94(4):1465–71. doi:
10.1038/s41390-023-02528-y
24.
Agarwal PK, Xie H, Sathyapalan-Rema A,
Meaney M, Godfrey K, Rajadurai V, et al.
Concurrent validity of the Ages and Stages
Questionnaires with Bayley Scales of Infant
Development-III at 2 years: Singapore cohort
study. Pediatr Neonatol. 2024;65(1):48–54. doi:
10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.03.013
25.
Manti F, Giovannone F, Ciancaleoni M, De Vita
G, Fioriello F, Gigliotti F, et al. Psychometric
properties and validation of the Italian version of