Co-design and experience from phenomenological perspective
Abstract
Abstract:
Co-design as an evolution of traditional design, is presented as a method by which people are involved as participants within a design process, where their voice, their feelings, and their skills are taken into account within the field of the collective and the experiential, through activities that take into account the way they live and experience the phenomena from the actors involved.
The above establishes a scenario of interest, to be able to approach the concept of experience from the people and the facilitator within the method, through a model oriented to the study of experiences in a profound way. Conceived from the theoretical and practical relationship with the field of phenomenology.
The proposal is developed within a rural community focused on the protection and care of water, presented as a citizen training and education project based on simplicity, called REMONA
Keywords: Co-design, Experience, Phenomenology.
Downloads
References
Battaerbee, K., & Koskinen, I. (2 de 9 de 2010). Co-experiencie: user experience as interaction. CoDesign, 1(1), 5-18.
Calvera, A., & Pombo, F. (2011). Blank Meaning as Design Affordance. Memory and Fictions (a dialogue between Anna Calvera and Fátima Pombo). KEPES, 43-55.
Dandavate, U., Sanders, E., & Stuart, S. (1996). Emotions matter: user empathy in the product development process. Human factors and ergonomics society 40th annual meeting, (págs. 415-418).
Eggersten, M. (2019). Placemaking as co-creation–professional roles and attitudes in practice. Codesign, 15(4), 289-307.
Husserl, E. (2014). Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica. Libro primero: Introducción general a la fenomenología pura. Ciudad de México, México: Fondo de cultura económica.
Merleau Ponty, M. (1975). Fenomenología de la percepción. (Cabanes, Trad.) Barcelona, España: Península.
M. V. (2016). Fenomenología de la práctica, métodos de donación de sentido en la investigación y la escritura fenomenológica. (L. G. Juan Carlos García, Trad.) Popayán, Cauca, colombia: Universidad del Cauca.
Polanyi, M. (2009). The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Press, M., & Cooper, R. (2017). The design experience: the role of design and designers in the twenty-first century. Routledge.
Sanders, E., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Codesign, 4(1), 5-18.
Van Dijk, J. (2013). Creating traces, sharing insight: explorations in embodied cognition design. Eindhoven, Netherlands: Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
Van Manen, M. (2016). Fenomenología de la práctica, métodos de donación de sentido en la investigación y la escritura fenomenológica. (L. G. Juan Carlos García, Trad.) Popayán, Cauca, colombia: Universidad del Cauca.
Van Rompay, T., Hekkert, P., & Muller, W. (2005). The bodily basis of product experience. Design studies, 26, 359-377.
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2009). De cuerpo presente: las ciencias cognitivas y la experiencia humana. España: Gedisa.
Viljoen, M. (2010). Embodiment and the experience of built space: The contributions of Merleau-Ponty and Don Ihde. South African Journal of Philosophy, 29(3), 306-329.
Visser, F. S., Stappers, P. J., Lugt, R. V., & Sanders, E. B.-N. (03 de 02 de 2007). Contexmapping: experiences from practice. Codesign, 1(2), 119-149.
Wright, P., McCarthy, J., & Meekison, L. (2003). Making sense of experience. Funology, 43-53.
