Archival, diagrammatic as cartographic as project axes of contemporary artistic practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18537/tria.13.01.06Abstract
The current discussion on contemporary artistic practice revolves around the changes and innovations that the artistic field has been facing after converting social life into the axis of research-creation. These changes have demanded from the artist the adoption of more creative techniques, methods and tools for research that allow the approach of the abstract, the symbolic and the imperceptible as a unit of meaning. In this direction, the role that archives diagrammatic and cartography have been playing as fields that enable the construction of conceptual models that 1) simplify complex phenomena 2) promote the recognition of apparently irrelevant factors, and 3) allow, that beyond the representation of reality, it is possible to build different visions of reality. This amalgamation of new tools also makes it possible to evaluate specific situations of social life through the expressive resources of art and aesthetics that go beyond the idea of systematization and open the door to experimental genres and hybrid models consistent with a hybrid world in which that the traditional technical means tested in art begin to show their insufficiency.
Keywords: Archive, Diagram, Cartography, Artistic turn, Contemporary artistic practices.
Downloads
References
Anderson, B., Harrison, P. (2010). La promesa de las teorías no representacionales. En: Anderson, B., Harrison, P- (Eds.), Teniendo lugar: teorías no representativas y geografía. Farnham: Ashgate.
Ambrozic, M., y Vettese, A. (2013). Art as a thinking process: Visual forms of knowledge. Venecia: Sternberg Press.
De Pascual, A., y Lanau, D. (2018). El arte es una forma de hacer y no una cosa que se hace. Madrid: Los libros de la catarata.
Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Athlone.
Dewsbury,J.D. (2000). La performatividad y el evento: promulgando una filosofía de la diferencia. Medio ambiente y planificación. pp. 473-496.
Frühsorge, J., Gansterer, N. (2015). ‘In conversation’. Fukt Magazine, 14.
Grupo de Educación de Matadero (2015). Ni arte ni educación Una experiencia en la que lo pedagógico vertebra lo artístico. Catarata: Madrid.
Guasch, A.M. (2005). Los lugares de la memoria: el arte de archivar y recordar. Materia (5), 157-183.
Laignelet, V. (2013). Arte como productor de conocimiento. Recuperado de https://radcolombia.org/web/sites/default/files/archivos/documentos/arte-como-productor-conocimiento-documento-academico.pdf.
Lorimer, H. (2005). Geografía cultural: El ajetreo de ser más que figurativo. Progreso en Geografía Humana, (29), 83-94.
Motta, G., Pizzigoni, A. (2008). La máquina de proyecto. Universidad Nacional de Colombia: Bogotá.
Perera, P. (2000). Los archivos de Michel Foucault. Sobre el dudoso murmullo que nos rodea a cada uno”. La impaciencia de la libertad. Michel Foucault y lo político. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.
Stoler, A. (2009). Laura. Along the archival grain. Epistemic anxieties and Colonial common sense. New Yersey: Princeton University Press,
Tello, M. (2015). El arte y la subversión del archivo. Aisthesis, (58). https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-71812015000200007
Tello, A. (2016). Foucault y la escisión del archivo. Revista de Humanidades, (34), 37-61.
Wittgenstein, L. (2007). Aforismos cultura y valor. Madrid: Austral.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
