Performative creativity in the age of artificial intelligence: abduction as a mediating element between humans and machines

Authors

  • PEDRO J. GÓMEZ Autonomous Community of the Region of Murcia

Abstract

This article presents a transdisciplinary theoretical review of creativity in the age of generative artificial intelligence (AI). Drawing on semiosis as a conceptual framework, it examines the transformations that these technologies introduce into contemporary processes of creation and meaning-making. The paper argues that creativity associated with generative AI does not reside exclusively in the outputs produced, but rather in the abductive process through which human users interpret, select, and assign meaning to those outputs based on their cultural and experiential backgrounds. From this perspective, AI can be understood as a semiotic extension that expands creative possibilities within human–machine co-creation dynamics. It is argued that (1) creativity in these contexts should be analyzed as a relational process between humans and AI assistants; (2) the attribution of creative value depends on sociocultural frameworks of evaluation; and (3) these interactions give rise to new hybrid creative practices. Within this paradigm, the concept of performative creativity and the Abductive Performative Creativity Model (CPA) are proposed as analytical tools for examining how creative meaning is configured within distributed agency dynamics.

KEYWORDS: performative creativity, generative artificial intelligence, human–AI co-creation, abduction, semiosis, computational creativity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atkinson, R., y Barker, S. (2023). AI and the social construction of creativity. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 29(4), 1054–1069. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231187730

Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and mind. Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, N., Roberts, I., y Watumull, J. (2023, March 8). The false promise of ChatGPT. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opinion/noam-chomsky-chatgpt-ai.html

Colton, S., y Wiggins, G. A. (2012). Computational creativity: The final frontier? In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI) (Vol. 242, pp. 21–26). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-098-7-21

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.

De Bono, E. (1998). El pensamiento lateral: Manual de creatividad. Paidós.

Doshi, A. R., y Hauser, O. P. (2024). Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content. Science Advances, 10, eadn5290. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn5290

Gadamer, H.-G. (1992). Verdad y método. Trotta.

Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory and practice. Basic Books.

Giannuzzo, A. (2023). Creativity, intentions, and self-narratives: Can AI really be creative? In N. Moniz, Z. Vale, J. Cascalho, C. Silva, y R. Sebastião (Eds.), Progress in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 52–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49011-8_5

Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. Springer.

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Indiana University Press.

Jordanous, A. (2012). A standardised procedure for evaluating creative systems: Computational creativity evaluation based on what it is to be creative. Cognitive Computation, 4(3), 246–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-012-9156-1

Kaufman, J. C., y Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688

Lockhart, J. (2025). Creativity in the age of AI: The human condition and the limits of machine generation. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 9, 84–85.

López de Mántaras, R. (2015). Algunas reflexiones sobre el presente y futuro de la inteligencia artificial. Novática, 234, 97–101.

López de Mántaras, R. (2024). 100 cosas que hay que saber sobre inteligencia artificial. Lectio Ediciones.

Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

O’Toole, C., y Horvát, E.-Á. (2024). Extending human creativity with AI. Journal of Creativity, 34, 100080.

Pareyson, L. (1974). Estetica: Teoria della formatività. Sansoni.

Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. I–VIII; C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, y A. Burks, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative (Fully revised and updated ed.). Capstone/Wiley.

Runco, M. A. (2023). AI can only produce artificial creativity. Journal of Creativity, 33, 100063.

Spagnuolo Nanni, A. (2020). La semiótica de Peirce: Una propuesta intermediadora entre las ciencias cognitivas y los estudios comparados de literatura y música. Archivum, 70(1), 269–281.

Sternberg, R. J., y O'Hara, L. (2005). Creatividad e inteligencia. CIC. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 10, 113–149. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/935/93501006.pdf

Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press.

Wiggins, G. A. (2006). Searching for computational creativity. New Generation Computing, 24(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03037332

Published

2026-07-02

How to Cite

GÓMEZ, P. J. (2026). Performative creativity in the age of artificial intelligence: abduction as a mediating element between humans and machines. Tsantsa. Journal of Artistic Research, (17), Articulo e6368. Retrieved from https://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/tsantsa/article/view/6984