A Measurement of Income Inequality According to Relative Income: Foundations, Simulation and Calculation for Peru, 2004 - 2017

Authors

  • Eloy Avalos Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25097/rep.n37.2023.04

Keywords:

Distributive inequality, relative income, Nash criterion, social welfare, Distributive inequality, relative income, Nash criterion, social welfare

Abstract

To propose an index for measuring income inequality based on the concept of relative income of the recipients and to carry out simulations. The index is referenced in descriptive statistical measures; as well as grounded in a framework of social welfare theory. The analytical foundation of the inequality measurement index is presented, summarized in the geometric mean and the arithmetic mean as expressions of effective and maximum well-being respectively. The proposed index may present problems if there are recipients with zero income; however, it can be approximated if you work with quantiles. Furthermore, it does not fulfill certain desirable properties of the inequality index. The measure of inequality based on descriptive statistics has a normative framework. The index presents a good performance measuring the inequality in the simulations under the Pareto, log normal and log logistic distributions. It also has a high correlation with the Gini index.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arrow, K. (1971). General Competitive Analysis. New York: North Holland.

Atkinson, A. (1970). On the Measurement of Inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 244-263.

Campano, F., & Salvatore, D. (2006). Income Distribution. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cowell, F. A. (2013). Measuring Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press, 3rd ed.

Dagum, C. (1980). Sistemas generadores de distribución del ingreso y la ley de Pareto. El Trimestre Económico, 47(188), 877-917.

Dalton, H. (1920). The Measurement of Inequality of Income. The Economic Journal, 30(119), 348-361.

Evans, M. J., & Rosenthal, J. S. (2004). Probability and Statistic. The Science of Uncertainty. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Figueroa, A. (1993). Crisis distributiva en el Perú. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Guerrero, V. M. (1987). A Note on the Estimation of Atkinson's Index of Inequality. Economics Letters, 25(4), 379-384.

Karelin, O., Rondero, C., & Tarasenko, A. (2008). Desigualdades. Métrodo de cálculo no tradicionales. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos.

Kendall, M., & Stuart, A. (1977). The Avanced Theory of Statistics. Volumen I. London: Charles Griffin.

Maskin, E. S. (1976). Social Welfare Functions on Restricted Domains. Massachusetts: Harvard University.

Medina, F. (2001). Consideraciones sobre el índice de Gini para medir la concentración del ingreso. Serie Estudios Estadísticos y Prospectivos 9, Comisión Económica para América Latina, División de Estadística y Proyecciones Económicas.

Milanovic, B. (1997). A Simple Way to Calculate the Gini Coefficient, and Some Implications. Economics Letters, 56(1), 45-49.

Nash, J. (1950). The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica, 18(2), 155-162.

Subramanian, S. (2004). Indicators of Inequality and Poverty. Research Paper, United Nation University, World Institute for Development Economic Research.

Villar, A. (2017). Lectures on Inequality, Poverty and Welfare. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Weymark, J. (2016). Social Welfare Functions. En M. D. Adler, The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy (págs. 1-37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Published

2023-01-30

How to Cite

Avalos, E. (2023). A Measurement of Income Inequality According to Relative Income: Foundations, Simulation and Calculation for Peru, 2004 - 2017. Economy and Politics Journal, (37), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.25097/rep.n37.2023.04

Issue

Section

Artículos