Tendencias en infraestructuras de datos espaciales en el contexto latinoamericano
Abstract
RESUMEN
Las infraestructuras de datos espaciales (IDE), a causa del cambio propiciado por tendencias tecnológicas como son dispositivos móviles, sensores y web2.0, están convergiendo hacia sistemas móviles, en tiempo real y con participación activa de los ciudadanos. Si bien estas tendencias ya han sido analizadas e integradas como parte de las IDE en Europa y Norteamérica, en el contexto Latinoamericano no se han investigado ni desarrollado lo suficiente. Por ello, con el objetivo de contribuir con su avance en Latinoamérica, este artículo documenta el estado del arte de las tendencias en Latinoamérica a partir de una revisión literaria, complementada con un sondeo sobre el estado de implementación de las tendencias tecnológicas. Los resultados muestran que a pesar de haberse identificado importantes iniciativas de implementación de nuevas tendencias IDE en distintos escenarios, su avance en Latinoamérica es aún incipiente, encontrándose todavía en lo que se conoce como la segunda etapa de evolución.
Palabras clave: Tendencias, dispositivos móviles, crowdsourcing, información geográfica voluntaria, sensores, latinoamérica.
ABSTRACT
Because of technological trends such as mobile devices, sensors and web2.0, Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDI) are converging to mobile systems in real-time and with active citizen participation. While these trends have been already analyzed and integrated as part of the SDI in Europe and North America, in the Latin American context, they have not been deeply investigated. Therefore, in order to contribute to its progress in Latin America, this article presents the state of the art of SDI’s trends in Latin America from a literature review, complemented with a regional survey. The results show that despite major initiatives implementing SDI’s trends; their progress in Latin America is still incipient, being still in what is call the second stage of evolution.
Keywords: Trends, mobile devices, crowdsourcing, volunteer geographic information, sensors, Latin America.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Botts, M., G. Percivall, C. Reed, J. Davidson, 2008. OGC sensor web enablement: Overview and high level architecture. Open GeoSensor Networks, 175-190.
Boulos, M., B. Resch, D.N. Crowley, J.G. Breslin, G. Sohn, R. Burtner, W.A. Pike, E. Jezierski, K-Y. Slayer Chuang, 2011. Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor web technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis management: trends, OGC standards and application examples. International journal of health geographics, 10(1), 1-29.
Brinkhoff, T., 2008. Supporting mobile GIS applications by Geospatial Web Services. In: 21st Congress of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Beijing. Disponible en http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVII/congress/4_pdf/154.pdf, 6 pp.
Bröring, A., K. Janowicz, C. Stasch, W. Kuhn, 2009. Semantic challenges for sensor plug and play. Disponible en http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de/~janowicz/w2gis09.pdf, 15 pp.
Christin, D., A. Reinhardt, S.S. Kanhere, M. Hollick, 2011. A survey on privacy in mobile participatory sensing applications. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(11), 1928-1946.
Coahuila, A., & Alberto, M., 2013. Monitoreo social colaborativo del dominio geográfico. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México, Tesis de nivel Posgrado, 91 pp. Disponible en http://tesis.ipn.mx:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/12684.
Colás, A., 2013. Participatory mapping in the design process of a spatial data infrastructure SDI: A case study in the Biosphere Reserve Rio Platano (Honduras). ISEGI - MSc Dissertations Geospatial Technologies (Erasmus-Mundus), 128 pp. Disponible en http://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/9203/1/TGEO0108.pdf.
Coleman, D., B. Sabone, N.J. Nkhwanana, 2010. Volunteering geographic information to authoritative databases: Linking contributor motivations to program characteristics. Geomatica, 64(1), 27-40.
Díaz, L., A. Remke, T. Kauppinen, A. Degbelo, T. Foerster, C. Stasch, M. Rieke, B. Schaeffer, B. Baranski, A. Broering, A. Wytzisk, 2012. Future SDI - Impulses from Geoinformatics Research and IT Trends. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 12, 378-410.
Esquivel, M., O.A. Hernández, R. Garnica, 2013. Modelo de accesibilidad peatonal (MAP). Bitacora, 23(2), 21-41.
Estupiñan, J., J.N.P. Castillo, 2013. Prototipo de servicio de observación y planificación de información geográfica recopilada mediante Geosensores en ambiente grid. Vínculos, 8(1), 93-105.
Fraile, P., Q. Bonastra, 2013. La cartografía de los temores: las web del delito en Iberoamérica. Revista de geografía Norte Grande, (56), 163-187.
Ganti, R., F. Ye, H. Lei, 2011. Mobile crowdsensing: Current state and future challenges. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 49(11), 32-39.
Goodchild, M., 2007. Editorial: Citizens as voluntary sensors : Spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web2.0. International Journal, 2(2), 24-32.
Goodchild, M., L. Li, 2012. Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics, 1, 110-120.
Maisonneuve, N., M. Stevens, M.E. Niessen, L. Steels, 2009. NoiseTube: Measuring and mapping noise pollution with mobile phones. Proceedings of the 4th International ICSC Symposium, Thessaloniki, Greece, 215-228.
Nittel, S., 2009. A survey of geosensor networks: Advances in dynamic environmental monitoring. Sensors, 9, 5664-5678.
Pereira, G., P.V. Florentino, M.C.F. Rocha, 2013. City as a social network-Brazilian examples. In: Urban and Regional Data Management: UDMS Annual 2013, London. Disponible en http://www.academia.edu/3844558/City_as_a_social_network_Brazilian_examples, 12 pp.
Rajabifard, A., A. Binns, I. Masser, I. Willismson, 2006. The role of sub-national government and the private sector in future spatial data infrastructures. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 727-741.
Ramage, S., M. Reichardt, 2012. User-generated spatial content and the need for SDI standards. In: SDI, Communities and Social Media. Prague, Czech Republic: Czech Centre for Science and Society, 33-59.
Roche, S., E. Propeck-Zimmermann, B. Mericskay, 2013. GeoWeb and crisis management: Issues and perspectives of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 78(1), 21-40.
Sadeghi-Niaraki, A. A. Rajabifard, K. Kim, J. Seo, 2010. Ontology based SDI to facilitate spatially enabled society. In: Proceedings of GSDI 12 World Conference. Disponible en http://www.gsdi.org/gsdiconf/gsdi12/papers/168.pdf, 10 pp.
Sheth, A., 2009. Citizen qensing, qocial qignals, and enriching human experience. IEEE Internet Computing, 4(13), 87-92.
Valencia, I., J. Ibáñez, E. Ramos, 2011. UbicaT: Tecnología incluyente para invidentes. Disponible en http://www.iiis.org/CDs2013/CD2013SCI/CISCI_2013/PapersPdf/CA228UF.pdf, 6 pp.
Van Zyl, T.L., I. Simonis, G. Mcferren, 2009. The sensor web: systems of sensor systems. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2(1), 16-30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Autors. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. for any article submitted from 6 June 2017 onwards. For manuscripts submitted before, the CC BY 3.0 License was used.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format |
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. |
Under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licenser endorses you or your use. |
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the licence permits. |