Towards a new epistemology of urban and architectural theory

Authors

  • Christian Contreras Escandón Universidad de Cuenca

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18537/est.v005.n009.07

Abstract

This article is a theoretical reflection review of colonialism and modernity.  Some authors called Latin American critical thought, suggest that after the end of colonialism and colonial administrations, has established a world-system, where the coloniality and modernity are two sides of the same coin, and Western epistemology dominates over other epistemologies. With the background of this critical position, there is a need to review urban approaches from a decolonial perspective, and intends to discuss contemporary urban and architectural theory from the perspective of modernity / coloniality. In conclusion it arises move to specific areas of teaching urban / architectural design, in Latin American universities, the analysis of the crisis of legitimacy of modern knowledge and its global impact..

Keywords: Epistemology, modernity, colonialism, architecture, urbanism, design

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Christian Contreras Escandón, Universidad de Cuenca

Architect

References

Ahumada Infante, Aldo. 2013. “Transmodernidad: dos proyectos disímiles bajo un mismo concepto.” Polis 12 (34): 291–305. http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-65682013000100015&lng=es&nrm=iso>.

Banai, Reza. 2012. “The metropolitan region: from concepts to indicators of urban sustainability”. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 6 (1). Routledge: 1–23. doi:10.1080/17549175.2012.668427.

Brenner, Neil, y Christian Schmid. 2015. “Towards a new epistemology of the urban?” City 19 (2-3). Routledge: 151–82. doi:10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712.

Borón, Atilio A., 2013. América Latina en la geopolítica del imperialismo, Buenos Aires Ediciones Luxemburgo.

Bulkeley, Harriet, y Michele Betsill. 2005. “Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel Governance and the ‘Urban’ Politics of Climate Change”. Environmental Politics 14 (1). Routledge: 42–63. doi:10.1080/0964401042000310178.

Dussel, Enrique. 2010. “El siglo XXI: nueva edad en la historia de la filosofÃ\-a en tanto diÃ!`logo mundial entre tradiciones filosÃ\textthreesuperiorficas”. Signos filosÃ\textthreesuperiorficos 12. scielomx: 119–40. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-13242010000100005&nrm=iso.

Escobar, Arturo. 2010. “Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise”, en Mignolo, Walter y Arturo Escobar, Globalization and the Decolonial Option, Londres, Routeledge, 33-64.

Farrés Delgado, Yasser. 2014. “Hacia una teoría urbana transmoderna y decolonial : una introducción”. Polis, Revista Latinoamericana 13 (2): 339–61.

Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2007. “THE EPISTEMIC DECOLONIAL TURN”. Cultural Studies 21 (2-3). Routledge: 211–23. doi:10.1080/09502380601162514.

Mignolo, Walter. 2009. “El lado más oscuro del Renacimiento 1”. Universitas Humanística 67: 165–203.

Roy, Ananya. 2009. “The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory”. Regional Studies 43 (6). Routledge: 819–30. doi:10.1080/00343400701809665.

Santos, Boaventura De Sousa. 2010. Descolonizar el saber, reinventar el poder. Development and Change. Vol. 44. doi:10.1111/dech.12026.

Published

2016-11-30

How to Cite

Contreras Escandón, C. (2016). Towards a new epistemology of urban and architectural theory. Estoa. Journal of the Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, 5(9), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.18537/est.v005.n009.07