Stimulation of the brain areas of speech and language in acquisition of literacy in children from 4 to 6 years
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.05.02.03Keywords:
stimulation, brain centers, psycholinguistic processing age, risks of non-readingAbstract
The objective of the study was to validate a model of stimulation procedures of the brain centers of speech and language, aiming the acceleration of read-write teaching in 4 to 6 years old children in two schools of Cuenca city. It was a prospective analytical study, with quasi-experimental design. The cluster type sample included 39 children in the intervention group and 60 in the control group. The experimental intervention lasted five months comprising educational activities, the rehabilitation of individual functions, and clinical group consulting and individual control. The composition of the sample groups was based on the average psycholinguistics age (PLA) of the children. The association between variables was measured using ANOVA to compare group behavior before and after; the t-Test for comparing means between groups. Previously, the homogeneity of the sample groups was determined using the Levene test. Kendal’s tau-b and tau-c were used to measure the association between the ordinal variables. A 95% confidence level was applied for the estimation of the confidence interval of the variables. The study showed an increase in the PLA average, from 4,78 to 6,11, similar to its parameters (p < 0,05), except for visual understanding (p > 0,05). However, the increase was greater in the intervention group, which benefited from the implementation of the brain center stimulation procedures (p < 0,05). The study clearly revealed that these procedures reduce the risk of reading difficulties in children (p < 0,05).
Downloads
Metrics
References
Calero, A., R. Pérez, 1990. La madurez para la lectura: Un concepto en revisión. Escuela Universitaria. de Formación de Profesorado de EGB, Universidad de Sevilla. Revista Plantel, 1, 70-90.
Calero, A., R. Pérez, A. Maldonado, M.E. Sebastián, 1991. Materiales curriculares para favorecer el acceso a la lectura en educación infantil. Madrid: Editorial Escuela Española, 21-39.
Christensen, A.L., 1987. El diagnóstico neuropsicológico de Luria (2ª Ed. Revisada). Madrid: Visor Libros, 21-37.
Da Fonseca, V., 2004. Dificultades de aprendizaje. México: Editorial Trillas, 73-101.
de Ajuriaguerra, J., G.B. Soubiran, 1959. Indications et techniques de rééducation psychomotrice en psychiatrie infantile. La Psychiatrie de l’Enfant, 2, 423-494.
Decroly, O., R. Buysse, 1928. La pratique des tests mentaux. Editorial F. Alcan, Paris, Bibliothèque de Psychologie de l'Enfant et Pédagogie, 5, 402 pp.
GCBA, 2010. La enseñanza primaria en contextos de desigualdad social y diversidad sociocultural: Estudio sobre políticas de atención al fracaso escolar en escuelas de educación común. Informes de Investigación de la Dirección de Investigación y Estadística del Ministerio de Educación del GCBA, Argentina. Descargado de http://www.buenosaires.gob.ar/areas/ educacion/dirinv/pdf/primaria_contextos_desigualdadsocial.pdf en febrero del 2014, 92 pp.
Heuyer, G., 1968. Les troubles mentaux, étude criminologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 467 pp.
Hidalgo, C., J. Rodríguez, 1988. Perfil de funcionamiento familiar según el test "Como es su Familia" para uso clínico. Psykhe, 7(2), 75-84.
Kirk, S., J. McCarthy, W. Kirk, 1994. Test Illinois de Aptitudes Psicolingüisticas (Manual). Madrid: Publicaciones de Psicología Aplicada, TEA Ediciones, 7, 42-47.
Koupernik, C., R. Dailly, 1976. Desarrollo neuropsíquico del lactante. Barcelona: Paideia, 7-43.
Luria, A.R., 1972. The Man with the Shattered World. Basic Books, New York, USA. Descargado de http://www.tarpuq.com/sites/default/files/blogPOC/neurociencias/LA%20NEUROPSICOLOGIA%20DE%20ALEXANDER%20LURIA.pdf en julio del 2013.
Luria, A.R., 1977a. On quasi-aphasic speech disturbances in lesions of the deep structures of the brain. Brain and Language, 4, 432-459.
Luria, A.R., 1977b. Las funciones corticales superiores en el hombre. La Habana: Editorial Orbe, 381-577.
Milito, N.I., 2001. La estimulación del lenguaje en niños de primer ciclo de educación general básica. Descargado de http://www.espaciologopedico.com/revista/articulo/150/estimulacion_del_ lenguaje_en_ninos_de_primer_ciclo_de_educacion_general_basica.html en julio del 2013.
Montalvo, J., 1999. Estimulación de las funciones neuropsicológicas para la lectura. Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, 253 pp.
Newman, R.G., 1967. Psychological consultation in the schools: A catalyst for learning. Basic Books, New York, USA.
Piaget, 1935. Remarques psychologiques sur le travail par équipes. Dans: Le travail par équipes à l’école. Genève, Bureau international d’Education, 179-196.
Rodríguez-Sacristán, J., 1998. Psicopatología del niño y del adolescente (2a ed.). Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla. Serie Manuales Universitarios, 31, 888 pp.
Sendón, M.A., 2008. Tasa de repitencia en el nivel primario: Variación 1996/7- 2006/7. Texto elaborado por el Ministerio de Educación Argentino, Buenos Aires. Descargado de http://www.mapaeducativo.edu.ar/Atlas/Tasa-de-repitencia-en-el-nivel-primario el 25 de enero 2012.
SINEC, 2010. Tasa de repitencia y deserción en el nivel básico: 2005/10. Descargado de http:educacion.gob.ec/sinec/ el 27 enero de 2012.
UNICEF, 1995. Repetition: Obstacle to education for all. New York, USA, Revista News, 12.
Viteri Díaz, G., 2006. Situación de la educación en el Ecuador. Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana, 70. Descargado de http://www.eumed.net/cursecon/ecolat/ec/2006/gvd.htm en enero del 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Autors. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. for any article submitted from 6 June 2017 onwards. For manuscripts submitted before, the CC BY 3.0 License was used.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format |
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. |
Under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licenser endorses you or your use. |
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the licence permits. |