Educational spaces for the present: architectural design based on Reggio Emilia pedagogy




school, project, spatial qualities, natural lighting, vegetation


Architectural space is relevant in the teaching-learning process; in this sense, Reggio Emilia pedagogy considers space as the third teacher. In this work, the architectural premises of the pedagogical model were identified, evaluation instruments were developed and applied to case studies. Six schools in different countries were evaluated. The school located in Japan obtained the highest score (16/17), while a case study located in Mexico obtained the lowest score (10/17). Overall results showed that contact with the outdoors was the premise with the highest score (100%), in second place connection with nature (72%) and in third place the incorporation of a space (63%). Information on projects that incorporate the architectural premises of Reggio Emilia pedagogy, as well as their evaluation, is scarce, so it is necessary to disseminate and analyze these educational spaces and develop evaluation instruments.


Download data is not yet available.


Abramson, S., Robinson, R., y Ankenman, K. (1995). Project Work with Diverse Students: Adapting curriculum based on the Reggio Emilia approach. Childhood Education, 71(4), 197–202.

Al, S., Sari, R. M., y Kahya, N. C. (2012). A Different Perspective on Education: Montessori and Montessori School Architecture. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1866–1871.

Alirio Pérez, Á., Africano Gelves, B. B., Febres-Cordero Colmenárez, M. A., y Carrillo Ramírez, T. E. (2016). Una Aproximación a las Pedagogías Alternativas. Educere, 20(66), 237–247.

Aljabreen, H. (2020). Montessori, Waldorf, and Reggio Emilia: A Comparative Analysis of Alternative Models of Early Childhood Education. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(3), 337–353.

ArchDaily. (29 de noviembre de 2012). Leimond-Shonaka Nursery School / Archivision Hirotani Studio .

ArchDaily México. (21 de enero de 2013). Escuela Infantil Municipal De Berriozar / Javier Larraz + Iñigo Beguiristain + Iñaki Bergera .

ArchDaily México. (27 de agosto de 2014). Kínder Monte Sinaí / LBR + A [Kínder Monte Sinaí / LBR + A].

ArchDaily México. (24 de abril de 2015). El Jardín Cubierto / Laboratorio Permanente [The Covered Garden / Laboratorio Permanente].

ArchDaily México. (22 de febrero de 2018). Hábitat Learning Community / Lara Hermanos.

ArchDaily México. (19 de junio de 2019). Preescolar Beelieve / 3Arquitectura .

Association Montessori International. (24 de mayo de 2023). AMI at UNESCO.

Association of Waldorf Schools of North America. (18 de enero de 2022). Waldorf Education.

Barrett, P., Treves, A., Shmis, T., Ambasz, D., y Ustinova, M. (2019). The Impact of School Infrastructure on Learning: A Synthesis of the Evidence. En The Impact of School Infrastructure on Learning: A Synthesis of the Evidence. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

Bartlett, S., y Gandini, L. (1993). Amiable space in the schools of Reggio Emilia: An interview with Lella Gandini. Children’s Environments, 10(2), 113–125.

Benoit, A. E. (1998). The Reggio Emilia Approach to Education [Tesis de Licenciatura Universidad Saint John’s]. Repositorio institucional.

Byun, W., Blair, S. N., y Pate, R. R. (2013). Objectively measured sedentary behavior in preschool children: Comparison between Montessori and traditional preschools. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10, 1-7.

Camacho Prats, A. (2017). La Arquitectura Escolar: Estudio de Percepciones. Revista internacional de educación para la justicia Social, 6(1), 31–56.

Canakcioglu, N. (2022). Exploring the social logic of preschool environments structured with Waldorf, Montessori, and Reggio Emilia. 13th Space Syntax Conference Paper, Bergen, Noruega.

Chartier, M.-A., y Geneix, N. (2006). Pedagogical Approaches to Early Childhood Education. Paper commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007, Strong foundations: early childhood care and education.

Chattin-McNichols, J. (2013). Work in Society and in Montessori Classrooms. Montessori Life: A Publication of the American Montessori Society, 25(3), 18–25.

Cossentino, J. (2009). Culture, Craft, & Coherence: The unexpected vitality of Montessori teacher training. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 520–527.

Damovska, L. (2005). The Waldorf-Pedagogy and Children With Special Needs. Journal of Special Education and Rehabilitation, 6(1–2), 35–42.

Díaz-Bajo, P. M. (2019). Panorama Actual de las Pedagogías Alternativas en España. Papeles Salmantinos de Educación, (23), 247–281.

Dodd-Nufrio, A. T. (2011). Reggio Emilia, Maria Montessori, and John Dewey: Dispelling Teachers’ Misconceptions and Understanding Theoretical Foundations. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(4), 235–237.

Eckhoff, A., y Spearman, M. (2009). Rethink, Reimagine, Reinvent: The Reggio Emilia Approach to Incorporating Reclaimed Materials in Children’s Artworks. Art Education, 62(2), 10–16.

Edwards, C. P. (2002). Three Approaches from Europe: Waldorf, Montessori, and Reggio Emilia. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 4(1), 78-90.

Ellis, J. (2004). The significance of place in the curriculum of children’s everyday lives. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 8(1), 23–42.

Filippini, T. (1993). The Experience of Reggio Emilia: a place where adults and children learn together. En Educare in Europe. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.

Fleming, D. J., Culclasure, B., y Zhang, D. (2019). The Montessori Model and Creativity. Journal of Montessori Research, 5(2), 1–14.

Fombella Coto, I., Aias Blanco, J. M., y San Pedro Veledo, J. C. (2019). Arquitectura escolar y metodologías docentes en el siglo XXI: respuestas a un nuevo paradigma educativo. Revista Inclusiones, 6(4), 65–91.

García, A. (2017). Otra Educación ya es Posible: Una Introducción a las Pedagogías Alternativas (6th ed.). Litera.

Goldshmidt, G. (2017). Waldorf education as spiritual education. Religion and Education, 44(3), 346–363.

Hall, T. (2017). Architecting the ‘third teacher’: Solid foundations for the participatory and principled design of schools and (built) learning environments. European Journal of Education Research, Development and Policy, 52(3), 318–326.

Jaatinen, J., y Lindfors, E. (2019). Makerspaces for Pedagogical Innovation Processes: How Finnish Comprehensive Schools Create Space for Makers. Design and Technology Education, 24(2), 42–67.

Jones, S. J. (2017). Technology in the Montessori Classroom: Teachers’ Beliefs and Technology Use. Journal of Montessori Research, 3(1), 16–29.

Lopata, C., Wallace, N. V., y Finn, K. V. (2005). Comparison of academic achievement between montessori and traditional education programs. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(1), 5–13.

Marshall, C. (2017). Montessori education: a review of the evidence base. Npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 1–9.

Mercilliott Hewett, V. (2001). Examining the Reggio Emilia Approach to Early Childhood Education. En Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 95–100.

Mitchell, L. M. (2007). Using Technology in Reggio Emilia-Inspired Programs. Theory Into Practice, 46(1), 32–39.

Moss, P. (2016). Loris Malaguzzi and the schools of Reggio Emilia: Provocation and hope for a renewed public education. Improving Schools, 19(2), 167–176.

Nicholson, D. W. (2000). Layers of experience: Forms of representation in a Waldorf school classroom. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(4), 575–587.

Nicholson, E. (2005). The school building as third teacher. En M. Dudek (Ed.), Children’s Spaces (1st ed., pp. 49–65). Taylor & Francis Group.

Nordlund, C. (2013). Waldorf Education: Breathing Creativity. Art Education, 66(2), 13–19.

Rinaldi, C. (2021). En diálogo con Reggio Emilia: escuchar, investigar, aprender. Discurso e intervenciones 1984-2016. Morata.

Roth, A. C., y Månsson, A. (2011). Individual development plans from a critical didactic perspective: Focusing on montessori- and Reggio Emilia-profiled preschools in Sweden. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 9(3), 247–261.

Schieren, J. (2012). The Concept of Learning in Waldorf Education. Research on Steiner Education, 3(1), 63–74.

Serra, M. F., y Fernández, F. (2020). Arquitectura escolar en el siglo XX: aproximaciones desde cuatro publicaciones latinoamericanas recientes. A&P Continuidad, 7(13), 72–81.

Soto, A. B. (2022). Revisión Crítica de la Historia y Desarrollo de la Educación Alternativa y las Escuelas de Segunda Oportunidad. Revista de Humanidades, (45), 171–196.

Stegelin, D. A. (2003). Application of the Reggio Emilia Approach to Early Childhood Science Curriculum. En Early Childhood Education Journal, 30 163-169.

Tarr, P. (2001). Aesthetic Codes in Early Childhood Classrooms: What Art Educators Can Learn from Reggio Emilia. Art Education, 54(3), 33–39.

Tillmann, S., Tobin, D., Avison, W., y Gilliland, J. (2018). Mental health benefits of interactions with nature in children and teenagers: a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 72(10), 958–966.

Trincado, S. (2020). El tercer maestro: arquitecturas para la pedagogía de Malaguzzi [Tesis de Licenciatura Universidad Politécnica de Madrid]. Repositorio institucional- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Uceda, P. Q., y Zaldívar, J. I. (2013). Waldorf education and play in the Kindergarden. An outstanding theoretical proposal. Bordon. Revista de Pedagogia, 65(1), 79–92.

UNESCO. (24 de Mayo de 2021). Non Governmental Organizations - Friends-Waldorf-Education-Rudolf-Steiner-Schools | UNESCO.

Vakil, S., Freeman, R., y Swim, T. J. (2003). The Reggio Emilia Approach and Inclusive Early Childhood Programs. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30(3), 187–192.

Westerberg, L., y Vandermaas-Peeler, M. (2021). How teachers, peers, and classroom materials support children’s inquiry in a Reggio Emilia-inspired preschool. Early Child Development and Care, 191(7–8), 1259–1276.



How to Cite

Zambrano-Prado, P., & Casas-Ibáñez, A. (2023). Educational spaces for the present: architectural design based on Reggio Emilia pedagogy. Estoa. Journal of the Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, 12(24), 174–190.