Prevalence of Meares-Irlen syndrome / Visual Stress that affects reading of third-grade children

Authors

  • Marcelo Bernal Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.06.01.06

Keywords:

visual perceptual distortiosn, reading discomfort, basic education, reading difficulties, síndrome Meares-Irlen, visual stress

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of MISViS, and identify the most common physical and visual perceptual discomfort that affect reading in third grade children of public and private Cuenca urban schools. Two hundred and sixty-seven third graders, as well as directors, parents and classroom teachers participated in this study. Children were assessed through observations, interviews and applying five tests of the Irlen Reading Perceptual Scale (IRPS®). MISViS prevalence in the severe range is 25.84% in the student population of the third grade of elementary schools in Cuenca, hindering the normal development of the reading process. The most common physical discomforts when reading were: i) moving closer to or further from the page (19.17%); ii) discomfort when reading under fluorescent lights (18.05%); iii) blinking very often (14.66%); and iv) pain, burning of the eyes while reading (12.78%). Within, the most common visual perceptual distortions identified are: i) the need of using the finger or marker while reading (37.59%); ii) choppy or slow reading (33.08%); iii) making effort to stay focused on the words, (28.95%); iv) avoiding reading or reading aloud (27.89%); and v) having trouble remembering what was read (19.92%); among others. It was concluded that MISViS prevalence in Cuenca urban schools is 25.84% for severe ranges; the most common visual perceptual distortions and physical discomfort when reading were also identified in this study group.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alder, L., M. Atwood, 1987. Poor readers: What do they really see on the page? A study of a major cause of dyslexia. Los Angeles CA: Los Angeles County Office of Education.

Andrade, P., 2011. Estrategias metodológicas activas para la enseñanza y aprendizaje de la lectoescritura en niños/as con capacidades especiales distintas en la Escuela Manuela Cañizares de Cotacachi. Tesis de Postgrado, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial, Quito,Ecuador. Disponible en http://repositorio.ute.edu.ec/handle/123456789/10256.

Bernal, M., 2011. Validación del método Irlen en escolares de 6 a 8 años, con trastornos de lectura. Tesis de pregrado, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Cuenca, 167 pp. Disponible en http://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/handle/123456789/2213.

Hoover, H.D., S.B. Dunbar, D.A. Frisbie, 2007. Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS). Forms A, B and C. Riverside Publishing: Ed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Irlen, H.,1983. Successful treatement of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the 91st annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, CA.

Irlen, H., M.J. Lass, 1989. Improving reading problems due to symptoms of scotopic sensitivity síndrome using Irlen Lenses and overlays. Education, 109(4), 413-417.

Johnson, P.J., G. Saba, E. Dorain, S. Belmont, 2000. A study to test the effectiveness of reading with Irlen coloured overlays for students with Irlen/Scotopic sensitivity syndrome. Paper presented at the 6th Irlen International Conference, Australia.

Jordan, D.R., 1972. Dyslexia in the classroom. Chicago, Illinois: Bell & Howell Co.

Kruck, R., Sumbler, K., Willows, D., 2008. Visual processing of children with Meares-Irlen syndrome. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt., 28(1), 35-46.

Kupfer, D., D. Regier, 2013.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. DSM-5 Task Force. Disponible en http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/ADHD%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf.

Lovegrove, W., 1984. Dyslexia and the visual factor. Education News, 19, 15-18.

MacGinitie, W.H., R.K. MacGinitie, K.M.L.G. Dreyer, K.E. Hughes, 2000. Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (GMRT®, 4th ed.). Riverside Publishing: Ed. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Miller, L.,1985. Scotopic sensitivity and reading disability. M.A. Thesis. California State University.

Olitsky, S.E., L.B. Nelson, 2003. Reading disorders in children. Pediatr. Clin. North Am., 50(1), 213-224.

Orton, S.T., 1925. World-blindness in school children. AMA Arch. Neuro. Psychiatry, 14(5), 581-615.

Robinson, G.L., B.R. Hopkins, T. Davies, 1995. The incidence of symptoms of Scotopic Sensitivity Syndrome in secondary school populations: A preliminary study. Bull. Learn. Disabil., 5, 36-56.

Robinson, G.L., J. Miles, 1987. The use of colored overlays to improve visual processing: A preliminary survey. Except. Child, 34(1), 65-70.

Scheiman, M., P. Blaskey, E.B. Ciner, M. Gallaway, M. Parisi, K. Pollack, R. Selznick, 1990. Vision characteristics of individuals identified as Irlen filter candidates. J. Am. Optom. Assoc., 61(8), 600-5.

Stein, J., S. Fowler,1985. Effect of monocular occlusion on viso-motor perception and reading in dyslexic children. Lancet, 2(8446), 69-73.

Stuart, J.R., S. Della Sala, R. McIntosh, 2011. Irlen colored overlays do not alleviate reading difficulties. Pediatrics, 128(4), e932-8.

Whithing, P., 1985. How difficult can reading be? New insight into reading problems. The Teaching of English. J. English Teachers Assoc., 49, 49-55

Published

2015-12-01

How to Cite

Bernal, M. (2015). Prevalence of Meares-Irlen syndrome / Visual Stress that affects reading of third-grade children. Maskana, 6(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.06.01.06

Issue

Section

Research articles