Extension and pedagogical practice in architecture
the “Architectural office” as a strategy for innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18537/est.v008.n015.a12Keywords:
architecture, social sustainability, social innovation, pedagogical practiceAbstract
The pedagogical practices developed in articulation with the extension office called "architectural consulting" attached to the architecture program of REMOVED in REMOVED, Colombia, are presented in order to reflect on the exercises developed in the light of one of the functions inherent in the university in the 21st century, innovation, specifically speaking of recent trends in social sustainability and its relationship with pedagogical practice in architecture. The adopted methodology, with a participatory approach, was developed in 4 phases: problem identification, work criteria, conceptualization, and implementation. Examples of the participatory works developed by students of the architecture program are shown, which generate alternatives for local development in the city, in places where the municipal administration and its planning structures do not reach to arrive in an effective way. Changes are identified in the role of pedagogical practices focused on social innovation and the new functions they assume, students, teachers and communities involved in the critical construction of the new citizenship.
Downloads
References
Beltrán-Llevador, J., Íñigo-Bajo, E. y Mata-Segreda, A. (2014). La responsabilidad social universitaria, el reto de su construcción permanente. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 5(14), 3-18
Bolaños, A. y Aguilera, F. (2014). Caracterización del modelo de aprendizaje a partir de laboratorios de diseño con énfasis en factores sociales. Revista de Arquitectura, 16, 26–37. doi: 10.14718/RevArq.2014.16.4
Bologna (2014). Bologna Regulation on Public Collaboration for Urban Commons. Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. LabGov - LABoratory for the GOVernance of commons (http://www.labgov.it). Recuperado de: http://www.labgov.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/Bologna-Regulation-on-collaboration-between-citizens-and-the-city-for-the-cure-and-regeneration-of-urban-commons1.pdf acceso febrero 07 de 2017.
CECAR (2018). Consultorio arquitectónico. Recuperado de: https://www.cecar.edu.co/consultorio-arquitectonico.html
Ekomadyo, A. y Yuliar, S. (2015). Social Reassembling as Design Strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 152-160.
El-Husseiny, M. A. y Kesseiba, K. (2012). Challenges of social sustainability in neo-liberal Cairo: re-questioning the role of public space. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 790-803.
Elrahman, A. S. A. (2016). Tactical Urbanism “A Pop-up Local Change for Cairo's Built Environment”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 224-235.
Felicetti, M. (2016). Cultural Innovation and Local development: Matera as a Cultural District. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 614 – 618.
Harazin, P. y Kósi, K. (2013). Social Challenges: Social Innovation through Social Responsibility. Periodica Polytechnica. Social and Management Sciences, 21(1), 27–38. doi: 10.3311/PPso.2154
Hillgren, P. A. y Seravalli, A. (2016). Counter-hegemonic practices; dynamic interplay between agonism, commoning and strategic design. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9(2), 89-99. doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.04
Howaldt, J., Domanski, D., y Kaletka, C. (2016). Social Innovation: towards a new innovation paradigm. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 17(6), 20-44.
Huybrechts, L., Dreessen, K., Schepers, S. y Calderon, P. (2016). Democratic dialogues that make cities ‘work’. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9(2), 100-111. doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.05
Ibarra, D. (2014). Desarrollo mundial evanescente. Journal of Economic Literature (JEL), 11 (32), 3-20.
Kelkar, N. P. y Spinelli, G. (2016). Building social capital through creative placemaking. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9(2), 54–66. doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.01
Lydon, M., Bartman, D., Woudstra, R. y Khawazard, A. (2012). Tactical urbanism 1. Short-term action, long-term change. New York, United States: Street Plans Collective. Recuperado de: <https://issuu.com/streetplanscollaborative/docs/tactical_urbanism_vol.1>
Manzini, E. (2014). Design in a changing, connected world. Strategic Design Research Journal, 7(2), 95-99. doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2014.72.06
Manzini, E. y Vezzoli, C. (2002). O desenvolvimento de produtos sustentáveis. Os requisitos ambientais dos produtos industriais. São Paulo, Brasil: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.
Matei, C. (2014). Globalization – An Anthropological Approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 149, 542 – 546.
McKenzie, S. (2004). Social Sustainability: Towards Some Definitions. Working Paper Series No 27. South Australia, Australia: Hawke Research Institute. University of South Australia, Magill. Recuperado de:<http://w3.unisa.edu.au/hawkeinstitute/publications/downloads/wp27.pdf>
Monfared, N. S. S., Hashemnejad, H., y Yazdanfar, S. A. (2015). Design principles in Sustainable Local Community with Security and Socialization Approach (Case study: Chizar). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 62-70.
Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R. y Sanders, B. (2007). Social Innovation. What is it, why it matters and how it can be accelerated, London, UK: The Basingstoke Press, The Young Foundation. Recuperado de: https://youngfoundation.org/publications/social-innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated/
Navastara, A. M., Pradinie, K. y Martha, K. E. (2016). Ambiguous Public Space Towards Social Sustainability in Madurese Urban Kampong. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 507-514.
Patarakin, Y. y Shilova, O. (2015). Concept of Learning Design for Collaborative Network Activity. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1083-1090.
Phills, J., Deiglmeier, K. y Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Fall, 33 – 43.
Pollice, F. (2016). Urban Planning and Architectural Design for Sustainable Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 6 – 8.
Romeiro Filho, E. (2015). Brazilian design for sustainability: in search of a local approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 467-474.
Salonia, P. (2016). Tourism, migration, heritage, culture, inclusion: recovering the memory of ourselves for the sustainable cities and the society of the XXI century. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 668 – 675.
Sanders, E. B. N. y Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5-18. doi: 10.1080/15710880701875068
Sarmah, B., Islam, J. U. y Rahman, Z. (2015). Sustainability, social responsibility and value co-creation: a case study based approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 314-319.
Selloni, D. y Manzini, E. (2016). Policy constellations as ecosystems of design actions: Exploring three cases of social innovation policies in Italy. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9(2), 128.
Tyl, B., Lizarralde, I. y Allais, R. (2015). Local value creation and eco-design: A new paradigm. Procedia CIRP, 30, 155 – 160.
Vallaeys, F. (2014). La responsabilidad social universitaria: un nuevo modelo universitario contra la mercantilización. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Superior, 5 (12), 105-117.
Van Reusel, H. (2016). Wandering as a design strategy for infrastructuring. Strategic Design Research Journal, 9(2), 112-127. doi: 10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.06
Vilar, K. y Cartes, I. (2016). Urban design and social capital in slums. Case study: Moravia´s neighborhood, Medellin, 2004-2014. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 216, 56 – 67.
Walker, S. (2014). Terra de resíduos: sustentabilidade e design com dignidade. En M. C. Loschiavo dos Santos. Design Resíduo y Dignidade (pp. 15–27). São Paulo, Brasil: Olhares.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Journal declines any responsibility for possible conflicts derived from the authorship of the works that are published in it.
The University of Cuenca in Ecuador conserves the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published works and will favor the reuse of the same ones, these can be: copy, use, diffuse, transmit and expose publicly.
Unless otherwise indicated, all contents of the electronic edition are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
