Urban biodiversity as a symptom of a sustainable city. Case study of the Yanuncay area in Cuenca, Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.06.01.09Keywords:
urban biodiversity, urban trees, green index, Cuenca, avifaunaAbstract
By testing the situation of urban biodiversity and green spaces in the area of Yanuncay in Cuenca (Ecuador), we intended to reveal peculiarities of co-determination between biodiversity and green areas within the city. Six indicators and three indexes were calculated and showed alarmingly low levels, suggesting the need for immediate action to recover the lost biodiversity. For example, in the case of the indicator of Permeability of Public Land, 83.53% is not permeable; in terms of the Proximity to Green Spaces, 98.82% of the study area does not approach the minimum target; regarding the calculation of Density of Trees in each Segment of Road, 98.83% of the sections have not enough trees. An important contribution of this work is the construction of the Green Urban Index (IVU) that combines two indicators Green Area per Person with Simultaneous Proximity to Three Types of Green Spaces, so that an integrated evaluation can be given to both: namely the quantity and the coverage, and the influence, at different scales, that these areas have over people. With this index we see that 91.76% of the area does not meet the minimum value. This data allows us to state that the present city and its production of green areas do not contribute to ecological sustainability and hence urban biodiversity. If urgent effective changes are not proposed to the actual city model, these values will become even more alarming.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Astudillo Webster, P., D. Siddons, 2013. Avifauna de la ciudad de Santa Ana de los cuatro ríos de Cuenca, Ecuador. Cuenca: Comisión de Gestión Ambiental de Cuenca, Municipalidad de Cuenca y Universidad del Azuay.
Czech, B., P.R. Krausman, 1997. Distribution and causation of species endagerment in the United States. Science , 22, 116-121.
Fábos, J.G., R.L. Ryan, 2006. An introduction to greenway planning around the world. Landscape and Urban Plan., 76, 1-6.
Instituto Nazca de Investigaciones Marinas, EcoCiencia, Ministerio del Ambiente, The Nature Conservancy, Conservación Internacional, 2007. Prioridades de Conservación de la Biodiversidad en Ecuador Continental, 88 pp. Disponible en http://simce.ambiente.gob.ec/ sites/default/files/documentos/anny/Prioridades%20para%20la%20Conservaci%C3%B3n%20de%20Biodiversidad%20en%20el%20Ecuador%20continental.pdf.
Lovejoy, T., 1980. Changes in biological diversity (Vol. 2). Washington DC: Penguin Books.
MacArthur, R., E. Wilson, 1963. An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution, 17(4), 373-387.
Marzluff, J.M. (Ed.), T. Angell, 2005. Cultural coevolution: How the human bond with crows and ravens extends theory and raises new questions. Yale: New Havens University Press.
Müller, N., P. Werner, 2010. Urban biodiversity and the case for implementing the convention on biological diversity in towns and cities. En: Urban biodiversity and design. Oxford:Wiley-Blacwell.
Müller, N., M. Ignatieva, C. Nilon, P. Werner, W. Zipperer, 2012. Patterns and trends in urban biodiversity and landscape design. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment . Elmqvist, Th., M. Fragkias, J. Goodness, B. Güneralp, P.J. Marcotullio, R.I. McDonald, S. Parnell, M. Schewenius, M. Sendstad, K.C. Seto, C. Wilkinson. (Eds.). Springer Netherlands, 755 pp.
Myers, N., R.A. Mittermeier, C.G.B. Mittermeier, G.A. da Fonseca, J. Kent, 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature , 403, 853-858.
Ortega, R., I. McGregor (Eds.), 2013. Ecología urbana: Experiencias en América Latina, 130 pp. Disponible en http://www1.inecol.edu.mx/libro_ecologia_urbana/ecologia_urbana_ experiencias_en_america_latina.pdf.
Rueda, S. (coord.), 2007. Libro Verde Medio Ambiente Urbano. Tomo I. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, 180 pp. Disponible en http://www.ecourbano.es/imag/libroverde.pdf.
Rueda, S. (coord.), 2008. Plan Especial de Indicadores de Sostenibilidad Ambiental de la Actividad Urbanística de Sevilla. Barcelona, 123 pp. Disponible en http://www.ecourbano.es/ imag/00%20DOCUMENTO%20ENTERO.pdf.
Rueda, S. (coord.), 2009. Plan de Indicadores de Sostenibilidad Urbana de Vitoria-Gasteiz.
Secretaría Nacional de la Administración Pública, 2013. Registro Oficial N. 138. Política Nacional de Gobernanza del Patrimonio Natural para la Sociedad del buen Vivir 2013-2017. Quito, Ecuador.
Tzoulas, K., P. James, 2010. Making biodiversity measures accesible to non-specialists: an innovative method for rapid assessment of urban biodiversity. Urban Ecosyst., 13, 113-127.
Ulloa Ulloa, C., P.M. Jørgensen, 1993. Arboles y arbustos de los Andes del Ecuador. Risskov, Denmark: Department of Systematics Botany, Aarhus University, 264 pp.
Wilkinson, C., M. Sendstad, S. Parnell, M. Schewenius, 2013. Urban governance of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services-Challenges and Opportunities: a Global Assessment. 539-587.
Zhang, W., 2008. A forecast analysis on world population and urbanization process. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 10(6), 717-730.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Autors. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. for any article submitted from 6 June 2017 onwards. For manuscripts submitted before, the CC BY 3.0 License was used.
You are free to:
 |
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format |
 |
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. |
Under the following conditions:
 |
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licenser endorses you or your use. |
| No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the licence permits. |
