Pavement evaluation based on non-destructive methods and inverse analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.06.01.11Keywords:
auscultation techniques, deflection, back-calculation, ANSYS, EVERCALC, finite elementAbstract
The feasibility and efficiency of impact deflectometry, to assess the structural capacity of flexible pavements on local roads of the southern E40 road network, were analyzed. Deflections generated by the impact of the non-destructive Falling Weight Deflectometer are interpreted using back-calculation techniques, such as proposed by AASHTO 93, LUKANEN, YONAPAVE and ROHDE. Those techniques enable the quantification and qualification of the structural deterioration level of existing pavement-subgrade systems by two parameters. The first parameter is derived from the resilient modulus, and its value is compared to the output of inverse and finite element analysis using respectively the EVERCALC and ANSYS software. The second parameter is defined by the structural capacity of the pavement-subgrade system, and derived applying the concept of characteristic deflection as described in the AASHTO Design Guide 93. The study revealed that the best method to characterize the road status is the analysis technique proposed by YONAPAVE. The approach not only presents results of the current condition of the road under study, but provides also recommendations regarding the management of road pavement. The developed methodology enables to elevate in future pavement engineering to pavement management engineering.
Downloads
Metrics
References
AASHTO, 1993. AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. Disponible en https://habib00ugm.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/aashto1993.pdf, 624 pp.
ASTM Standards, 2003. Standard guide for general pavement deflection measurements. ASTM D4695-03, Standard Guide for General Pavement Deflection Measurements, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003, www.astm.org.
ASTM International, 2003. Standard test method for deflections with a falling-weight-type impulse load device. ASTM Standards: number D 4694-96. Disponible en http://library.sut.ac.th:8080/ astm/cd04032005/PDF/D4694.pdf, 3 pp.
Asphalt Institute, 2000. Manual Series-17: Asphalt overlays for highway and street rehabilitation (9th ed.). Disponible en http://www.asphaltinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/public/engineering/ SW_1_Users_Guide_ver_103.pdf.
Corros, M., E. Urbaéz, G. Corredor, 2009. Manual de evaluación de pavimentos. Empresa MAYER 97 Ingenieros Asociados, C.A. Disponible en https://sjnavarro.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/ manual-de-evaluacion1.pdf, 249 pp.
del Aguila Rodríguez, P., 2007. Determinación del módulo resiliente del suelo de fundación mediante método mecanistico-empiricista: Método Hogg Simplificado. Ponencia presentada al XIV Congreso Ibero Latinoamericano del Asfalto, La Habana, Cuba. Disponible en http://www.camineros.com/docs/cam057.pdf, 17 pp.
Guzmán Suárez, E.A., 2009. Evaluación estructural de pavimentos flexibles a partir de información tomada con el deflectometro de impacto. XVII Simposio Colombiano sobre Ingeniería de Pavimentos, Universidad EAFIT, Colombia
Higuera Sandoval,C.H., 2010. Caracterización de la resistencia de la subrasante con la información del deflectómetro de impacto. Dialnet, 19(28), 73-92.
Hoffman, M.S., 2003. A direct method for evaluating the structural needs of flexible pavements based of FWD deflections. YONA, Engineering Consulting & Management Ltd., Haifa, Israel. Disponible en http://www.academia.edu/9968038/A_Direct_Method_for_Evaluating_ the_Structural_Needs_of_Flexible_Pavements_Based_on_FWD_Deflections, 13 pp.
Huang, Y.H., 2004. Pavement analysis and design (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Liu, W., T. Scullion, 2001. Modulus 6.0 for Windows: User's Manual. Texas Transportation Institute, Austin, Texas. Disponible en http://d2dtl5nnlpfr0r.cloudfront.net/tti.tamu.edu/documents/1869-2.pdf, 52 pp.
Lukanen, E.O., C. Han, 1992. Pavement performance prediction models. Minnesota: Department of Transportation. Publisher: Braun Intertec Pavement, 121 pp.
Montejo Fonseca, A., 2002. Ingenieria de pavimentos para carreteras (2nd ed.). Bogotá, D.C: Agora Editores.
Murillo Feo, C.A., L.E. Bejarano Urrego, 2013. Correlation between deflections measurements on flexible pavements obtained under static and dynamic load techniques. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris, pp. 393-398. Disponible en http://www.cfms-sols.org/sites/all/lic/pages/download_pdf.php?file=393-398.pdf.
Roa Garzón, M.A., D.A. Garzón Alvarado, 2012. Introducción al modelamiento por elementos finitos con ANSYS. Bogotá: Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica y Mecatrónica, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Rohde, G.T., 1994. Determining pavement structural number from FWD testing. In: Transportation Research Record 1448. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., pp. 61-68.
Rodriguez Calderón, W., M.R. Pallarez Muñoz, 2009. Desarrollo de un modelo de elementos finitos para el diseño racional de pavimentos. Tecnura, 9(17), 26-37.
Suarez Dominguez, F.J., 2001. Manual de diseño de ANSYS. España.
WSDOT, 2005. Everseries User Guide: Pavement analysis computer software and case studies. Washington State Department of Transportation, Enviromental and Engineering Programs, Washington, D.C. Disponible en http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/0C02BB7B-C345-4958-AA08-089E5E512B96/0/EverseriesUserGuidePart1.pdf, 122 pp.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Autors. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. for any article submitted from 6 June 2017 onwards. For manuscripts submitted before, the CC BY 3.0 License was used.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format |
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. |
Under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licenser endorses you or your use. |
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the licence permits. |