Benthic crustaceans and macrophytes as indicators of ecological quality in the lakes of the Southern Andes of Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.08.01.07Keywords:
crustacenas, macrophytes, indicators, ecological quality, Andes, South of EcuadorAbstract
The taxonomic composition of the litoral benthic limnetic crustacean communities, (branchiopods, copepods and ostracods) and macrophytes of the lacustrine water bodies of the Cajas National Park located in the Southern Andes of Ecuador have been studied in order to identify the most suitable taxa to be used as indicators of the ecological status of lakes. Among the crustaceans (22 taxa) three groups were differentiated. A first group with taxa of higher indicator value including Branchinecta papillata, Ilyocryptus spinosus, Alonella sp, Pleuroxus sp. Paralona pigra and Alona sp. gr. manueli. A second group with medium indicator value including Alona glabra, Alona guttata, Microcyclops sp. Eucyclops sp. and Paracyclops sp. The third group was formed by taxa of the lower indicator value, either because of its eurioic and / or cosmopolitan character or because of its rarity. Macrophytes have been evaluated as good indicators of the ecological and conservation status of the lakes. The taxa which were submerged, floating and rooted in the sediment were identified to be a good indicator for the water body, and helophytes and hygrophytes for the limnetic litoral zone.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alexander ML, Woodford MP, Hotchkiss SC (2008). Freshwater macrophyte communities in lakes of variable landscape position and development in northern Wisconsin, U.S.A. Aquatic Botany 88:77-86
Alonso M (1996). Crustacea, Branchiopoda. En: Fauna Iberica, Vol 7. Ramos et al. (Eds.). Madrid, España: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. CSIC, 486 pp
Alonso M (1998). Las lagunas de la España peninsular. Limnética 15:1-176
Barko JW, Adams MS, Clesceri NL (1986). Environmental factors and their consideration in the management of submersed aquatic vegetation: a review. Journal Aquatic Plant Management 24:1-10
Boucherle MM, Züllig H (1983). Cladoceran remains as evidence of change in trophic state in three Swiss lakes. Hydrobiologia 103:141-146
Carpenter SR, Lodge DM (1986). Effects of submersed macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquatic Botany 26:341-370
Chambers PA, Kalff J (1985). Depth distribution and biomass of submersed aquatic macrophyte communities in relation to Secchi depth. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42:701-709
Clayton J, Edwards T (2006). Aquatic plants as environmental indicators of ecological condition in New Zealand lakes. Hydrobiologia 570:147-151
De Eyto E, Irvine K, Free G (2002). The use of members of the family Chydoridae (Anomopoda, Branchiopoda) as an indicator of lake Ecological Quality in Ireland. Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 102B:81-91
De los Ríos Escalante P, Kotov A (2015). Checklist of Branchiopoda (Anostraca and Cladocera) of Chilean continental waters. Zootaxa 4027(3):366-388
Duigan C (1992). The ecology and distribution of the litoral freshwater Chydoridae Branchiopoda Anomopoda of Ireland, with taxonomic comments on some species. Hydrobiologia 241:1-70
Elías-Gutiérrez M, Martínez-Jerónimo F, Ivanova NV, Valdéz Moreno M, Hebert PDN (2008). DNA barcodes for Cladocera and Copepoda from Mexico and Guatemala, highlights and new discoveries. Zootaxa 1839:1-42
Frey DG (1960). The ecological significance of cladoceran remains in lake sediments. Ecology 41:584-689
Frey DG (1988). Littoral and offshore communities of diatoms, cladocerans and dipterous larvae, and their interpretation in paleolimnology. Journal of Paleolimnology 1:179-191
Fryer G (1993). The freshwater Crustacea of Yorkshire: a faunistic and ecological survey. Leeds, UK: Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union and Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society, 312 pp
Hann BJ, Leavitt PR, Chang PSS (1994). Cladocera community response to experimental eutrophication in Lake 227 as recorded in laminated sediments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51:2312-2321
Harmsworth R, Whiteside M (1968). Relation of cladoceran remains in lake sediments to primary productivity of lakes. Ecology 49:998-1000
Helawell JM (1978). Biological surveillance of rivers. Stevenage, England: Water Research Centre, 325 pp
Hofmann W (1987). Cladocera in space and time: analysis of lake sediments. Hydrobiologia 145:315-321
Kiefer F (1978). Freilebende Copepoda. In: Das zooplankton der binnengewässer, 2. Teil. Stuttgart, Germany: Die Binnengewässer 26.2 Teil, 343 pp
Kiersch B, Mühleck R, Gunkel G (2004) Las macrófitas de algunos lagos alto-andinos del Ecuador y su bajo potencial como bioindicadores de eutrofización. Revista de biología tropical 52:829-837
Kotov AA, Stifter P (2006). Family Ilyocryptidae (Branchiopoda: Cladocera: Anomopoda). Leiden, the Netherlands: Backuys Publishers, 171 pp
Margalef R (1955). Los organismos indicadores en la limnología. Biología de las aguas continentales,12. Madrid, España: Inst. For. Inv. Exp., Ministerio Agricultura, 300 pp
Mezquita F, Miracle MR (1997). Chydorid assemblages in the sedimentary sequence of Lake La Cruz, Spain, subject to water level changes. Hydrobiologia 360:277-285
Robertson AL (1990). The population dynamics of Chydoridae and Macrothricidae (Cladocera, Crustacea) form the River Thames, UK. Freshwater biology 24:375-389
Rogers DC, De los Rios P, Zuñiga O (2008), The Anostraca of Chile (Branchiopoda). Journal of Crustacean Biology 28:543-550
Sinev AY (1998). Alona ossiani sp. n., a new species of the Alona affinis complex from Brazil, deriving from the collection of G.O. Sars (Anomopoda: Chydoridae). Arthropoda Selecta 7(2):103-110
Smirnov NN (1996). Cladocera: the Chydorinae and Sayciinae (Chydoridae) of the world. Guides to the identification of the microivertebrates of the Continental Waters of the World, Vol. 11. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing, 197 pp
Whiteside MC (1970). Danish chydorid Cladocera: modern ecology and core studies. Ecological Monographs 40:79-118
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Autors. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. for any article submitted from 6 June 2017 onwards. For manuscripts submitted before, the CC BY 3.0 License was used.
You are free to:
 |
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format |
 |
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. |
Under the following conditions:
 |
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licenser endorses you or your use. |
| No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the licence permits. |
