Cycling and public transportation sharing space: An option to increase cycling ridership
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.08.02.06Keywords:
shared bus-bike lanes, guidelines, ParisAbstract
Allowing cyclists in bus lanes is an alternative to encourage diversity in mobility within consolidated cities, as this allows providing an infrastructure for cycling in places where for the limited right-of-way it is not possible to provide an independent lane. Apart of efficiency and safety, combining two modes of transport in the same space generates concerns such as the bus-cyclist interaction. Therefore, the design of shared bus-bike lanes (SBBLs) should ensure efficiency and safety for buses and cyclists. The lack of a general standard for the design of SBBLs hindered their implementation in the cities of developing countries that generally lack the human, economic and technical resources to adjust via research the design to the prevailing local conditions. This paper presents an analysis of design guidelines for SBBLs applied in Europe, North America and Australia, showing that the type of cycling infrastructure, the alignment within the SBBL and the lane width, are the parameters that should be considered to ensure safety and efficiency of these two modes. Furthermore, review of the literature on bus and bicycle mobility systems in Paris, revealed that increasing the public transport and cycling ridership not only depends on the quality of the built infrastructure, but also on the coordination between the design, operation, enforcement and control of the proper use of such structures and the measures implemented to discourage the use of private vehicles.
Downloads
Metrics
References
AASHTO. (2012). Guide for the development of bicycle facilities (4th ed., 17 pp). Washington DC, NJ: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
ACEA. (2016). The automobile industry pocket guide 2016-2017. European automobile manufacturers association. Retrieved from http://www.acea.be/uploads/publications/ ACEA_Pocket_Guide_2016_2017.pdf
Agrawal, A. W., Goldman, T., Hannaford, N. (2012). Shared-use bus priority lanes on city streets: Case studies in design and management (No. CA-MTI-12-2606). Retrieved from http://transweb.sjsu.edu/PDFs/research/2606-shared-use-bus-priority-lanes-city-streets.pdf
Aluvihare, R. (2014). Designing networks and parking: A major task for the urban designer. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Plan Amsterdam, 16-23. Retrieved from https://www.amsterdam.nl/publish/pages/847438/planam-04-2014_corr.pdf
Baumann, C., Brennan, T., Zeibots, M. E. (2012). Bike rider and bus driver interaction study - Draft report prepared for the City of Sydney. Sydney, Australia: Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, 23 pp. Retrieved from https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/ default/files/Baumannetal2012bikeandbus.pdf
Cardiff Cycle Network. (2011). Cardiff cycle design guide. Cardiff, U.K.: Cardiff Council, 123 pp. Retrieved from http://www.keepingcardiffmoving.co.uk/uploads/documents/37/ original/Design_Guide_FINAL. pdf?1319638020.
De Ceunynck, T., Dorleman, B., Daniels, S., Laureshyn, A., Brijs, T., Hermans, E., & Wets, G. (2017). Sharing is (s)caring? Interactions between buses and bicyclists on bus lanes shared with bicyclists. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46(B), 301-315, https://doi-org.kuleuven.ezproxy.kuleuven.be/10.1016/j.trf.2016.09.028.
Direction Territoriale Paris. (2009). Mobilité durable. Les pistes cyclables. N° 7, aout 2009.
Flemish Government. (2014). Vademecum bicycle infrastructure. Brussels, Belgium.
Frings, D., Parkin, J., Ridley, A. (2014). The effects of cycle lanes, vehicle to kerb distance and vehicle type on cyclists' attention allocation during junction negotiation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 72, 411-421. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.034
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: using public space. London, U.K.: Island Press.
Global BRT Data. (2017). Accessed May 19th, 2017. Retrieved from http://www.brtdata.org.
Google maps. (2016). Street view. Accessed May 18th, 2017
Heydon, R., Smith, M. L. (2014). Making space for cycling: A guide for new developments and street renewals. Cambridge Cycling Campaign, Cyclenation, 36 pp. Retrieved from http://www.makingspaceforcycling.org/ MakingSpaceForCycling.pdf
Hillsman, E., Hendricks, S., Fiebe, J. (2012). A summary of design, policies and operational characteristics for shared bicycle/bus lanes. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, 167 pp. Retrieved from https://www.nctr.usf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/77937.pdf
Hurwitz, D., Jannat, M., Warner, J., Monsere, C. M., Razmpa, A. (2014). Towards effective design treatments for right-turns at intersections with bicycle traffic. Portland State University, FHWA-OR-RD-16-06 report, 284 pp. Retrieved from http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1317&context=cengin_fac
L’Observatoire des Déplacement à Paris. (2015). Le Bilan des Déplacements en 2015 à Paris. Mairie de Paris, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.paris.fr/services-et-infos-pratiques/deplacements-et-stationnement/deplacements
Lin, P., Lee, C., Kourtellis, A., Saxena, M. (2010). Evaluation of camera-based systems to reduce transit bus side collisions. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Center for Urban Transportation Research. Final Report: BDK85 Two 977-08, 90 pp. Retrieved from http://www.nctr.usf.edu/pdf/77905.pdf
Nicholson, F. (1978). Attitudes of a sample of cyclists to using single-track roads. Crowthorne, Berkshire: Access and Mobility Division, Transport Operations Department, Transport and Road Research Laboratory. No. TRRL Supp Report 357, Monograph
Parkin, J., Wardman, M., Page, M. (2007). Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(2), 364-371.
Parkin, J., Meyers, C. (2010). The effect of cycle lanes on the proximity between motor traffic and cycle traffic. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(1), 159-165.
Population Reference Bureau. (2016). 2016 World population data sheet with a special focus on human needs and sustainable resources. Retrieved from http://www.prb.org/pdf16/prb-wpds2016-web-2016.pdf
Pucher, J., Buehler, R. (2008). Making cycling irresistible: lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28(4), 495-528.
Pucher, J., Dill, J., Handy, S. (2010). Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Preventive Medicine, 50, S106-S125.
Pucher, J., Buehler, R. (2012). City cycling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 416 pp.
Reid, S., Guthrie, N. (2004). Cycling in bus lanes. Berkshire, U.K.: Prepared for Charging and Local Transport Division, Department for Transport. TRL report 610, 32 pp.
Reza, Z., Miandoabchi, E., Szeto, W. Y., Rashidi, H. (2013). A review of urban transportation network design problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(2), 281-302.
Sando, T., Moses, R. (2010). Integrating transit into traditional neighborhood design policies - The influence of lane width on bus safety. Jacksonville, FL: University of North Florida, and FAMU- FSU College of Engineering. Accessed March 2nd, 2012 from http://www.dot.state.fl.us/ transit/Pages/LaneWidthonBusSafety.pdf
Shackel, S. C., Parkin, J. (2014). Influence of road markings, lane widths and driver behaviour on proximity and speed of vehicles overtaking cyclists. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 73, 100-108 https://doi-org.kuleuven.ezproxy.kuleuven.be/10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.015
Transport for London Consultation. (2014). London cycling design standards consultation: Cycles lanes and tracks (Chap. 3), 69 pp. Retrieved from https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/cycling/draft-london-cycling-design-standards/user_uploads/ch3-cycle-lanes-and-tracks.pdf
United Nations. (2013). Planning and design for sustainable urban mobility. Global report on human settlements 2013. Abingdon-on-Thames, U.K.: Routledge, 348 pp. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/planning-and-design-for-sustainable-urban-mobility-global-report-on-human-settlements-2013/
Veith, G., Eady, P. (2014). Cycling aspects of austroads guides. (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Austroads Ltd.
Vélocité. (2005). La complémentarité entre vélo et transport public. La Revue du Cycliste Urbain, 79, Retrieved from http://www.fub.fr/velocite
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Autors. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. for any article submitted from 6 June 2017 onwards. For manuscripts submitted before, the CC BY 3.0 License was used.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format |
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. |
Under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licenser endorses you or your use. |
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the licence permits. |