Hydraulic assessment of waste stabilization ponds: Comparison of computational fluid dynamics simulations against tracer data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.02.01.05Keywords:
Waste Stabilization Pond (WSP), tracer study, computational fluid dynamics (CFD)Abstract
The overall performance of a wastewater treatment plant is in addition to the effectiveness of the biokinetic processes controlled by the flow dynamics. A wide used technique to characterize the water flow dynamics is the use of tracers. At full-scale tracer experiments in wastewater treatment plants provide insufficient information to completely grasp the flow dynamics. Additionally results are often biased by uncontrolled external factors. As alternative, computational fluid dynamic (CFD) models for performance analysis of existing and the design of new wastewater treatment plants have been increasingly used over the last decade. The paper presents the results of a tracer experiment against the output of a CFD model with application to a 7 ha large maturation pond. The tracer study was conducted with the fluorescence dye Rhodamine WT using the stimulus response technique. The three dimensional CFD model was built considering a variable density distribution of spatial grids based on the specific characteristics of the system. For the unsteady flow simulations the turbulence model k-e was adopted. Residence time distribution (RTD) generated by both approaches were compared and showed fairly good agreement. The velocity and turbulence profiles of the CFD model were compared with experimental data confirming, although the high computational demand, the robustness of the used CFD model.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Dochain, D., S. Gregoire, A. Pauss, M. Schaegger, 2003. Dynamical modelling of a waste stabilisation pond. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng., 26, 19-26.
Domonte, M., D.D. Mara, 1987. The Hydraulic Performance of Waste Stabilizations Ponds in Portugal. Water Sci. Technol., 19, 219-227.
Espinoza, E., P. Rengel, 2009. Evaluacion Hidraulica de la Planta de Tratamiento de Aguas Residuales de Ucubamba. Universidad de Cuenca, Engineering Faculty, Cuenca, Ecuador, 80 págs.
Karteris, A., A. Papadopoulos, G. Balafoutas, 2005. Modeling the temperature pattern of a covered anaerobic pond with computational fluid dynamics. Water Air Soil Pollut., 162, 107-125.
Levenspiel, O., 1999. Chemical Reaction Engineering, 3rd Ed, Wiley & Sons, NJ, USA.
Mara, D., G.P. Alabaster, H.W. Pearson, S.W. Mills, 1992. Waste Stabilization Ponds: A Design Manual for Eastern Africa. Lagoon Technology International, Leeds, England.
Moreno, M. D., 1990. A Tracer Study of the Hydraulics of Facultative Stabilization Ponds. Water Res., 24, 1025-1030.
Peterson, E.L., J.A. Harris, L.C. Wadhwa, 2000. CFD modelling pond dynamic processes. Aquacult. Eng., 23, 61-93.
Salter, H.E., C.T. Ta, S.C. Williams, 2000. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamic modelling of a facultative lagoon. Water Sci. Technol., 42, 335-342.
Shilton, A., 2000. Potential application of computational fluid dynamics to pond design. Water Sci. Technol., 42, 327-334.
Shilton, A., J. Harrison, 2003. Integration of coliform decay within a CFD (computational fluid dynamic) model of a waste stabilisation pond. Water Sci. Technol., 48, 205-210.
Shilton, A., S. Kreegher, N. Grigg, 2008. Comparison of computation fluid dynamics simulation against tracer data from a scale model and full-sized waste stabilization pond. J. Environ. Eng., 134, 845-850.
Shilton, A., T. Wilks, J. Smyth, P. Bickers, 2000. Tracer studies on a New Zealand waste stabilisation pond and analysis of treatment efficiency. Water Sci. Technol., 42, 343-348.
Sweeney, D.G., J.B. Nixon, N.J. Cromar, H.J. Fallowfield, 2005. Profiling and modelling of thermal changes in a large waste stabilisation pond. Water Sci. Technol., 51, 163-172.
Sweeney, D.G., J.B. Nixon, N.J. Cromar, H. J. Fallowfield, 2007. Temporal and spatial variation of physical, biological, and chemical parameters in a large waste stabilisation pond, and the implications for WSP modelling. Water Sci. Technol., 55, 1-9.
Torres, J.J., A. Soler, J. Saez, L.M. Leal, M.I. Aguilar, 1999. Study of the internal hydrodynamics in three facultative ponds of two municipal WSPS in Spain. Water Res., 33, 1133-1140.
Torres, J.J., A. Soler, J. Saez, M. Llorens, 2000. Hydraulic performance of a deep stabilisation pond fed at 3.5 m depth. Water Res., 34, 1042-1049.
Torres, J. J., A. Soler, J. Saez, J.F. Ortuno, 1997. Hydraulic performance of a deep wastewater stabilization pond. Water Res., 31, 679-688.
Valero, M.A.C., D. Mara, 2009. The influence of algal biomass on tracer experiments in maturation ponds. Desalin. Water Treat., 4, 89-92.
Vedantam, S., J.B. Joshi, S.B. Koganti, 2006. CFD simulation of RTD and mixing in the annular region of a Taylor-Couette contactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45, 6360-6367.
Vega, G.P., M.R. Pena, C. Ramirez, D.D. Mara, 2003. Application of CFD modelling to study the hydrodynamics of various anaerobic pond configurations. Water Sci. Technol., 48, 163-171.
Wood, M.G., P.F. Greenfield, T. Howes, M.R. Johns, J. Keller, 1995. Computational fluid dynamic modeling of waste-water ponds to improve design. Water Sci. Technol., 31, 111-118.
Wood, M.G., T. Howes, J. Keller, M.R. Johns, 1998. Two dimensional computational fluid dynamic models for waste stabilisation ponds. Water Res., 32, 958-963.
Yanez, F., 1986. Manual de Metodos Experimentales "Evaluacion de Lagunas de Estabilizacion". In: CEPIS (Ed.) Serie Tecnica 24. OPS-OMS, Lima, Peru, 181 págs.
Yanez, F., 1993. Lagunas de Estabilizacion - Teoria, Diseño, Evaluacion y Mantenimiento, ETAPA, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Autors. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. for any article submitted from 6 June 2017 onwards. For manuscripts submitted before, the CC BY 3.0 License was used.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format |
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. |
Under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licenser endorses you or your use. |
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the licence permits. |