A preliminary response from the Faculty of Psychology students of the University of Cuenca to the modified EFL teaching approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.08.01.05

Keywords:

EFL, student-centered instruction, reading, research articles, Faculty of Psychology

Abstract

English teachers in Ecuadorian universities, like teachers in many non-native English-speaking countries, face the challenge of dealing with uninterested, unmotivated students, even when intermediate proficiency of English is a basic requirement for graduation. As from the end of 2014, the Faculty of Psychology of the University of Cuenca modified the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction at the three proficiency levels of English learning, by linking the training in reading to the reading of major related material and stimulating the students to practice actively the four English language skills outside the classroom using website and video hosting sites. At the end of 2016, the students’ impressions of being exposed to the modified way of student-centered instruction were assessed using a questionnaire. A total of 106 students completed online the 10-question survey. Results showed the enthusiasm of the students towards the modified more dynamic and interactive mode of EFL instruction; appreciated that more autonomy and responsibility were given to the students, and suggested that focus on grammar should not be neglected. An important side effect of the approach was the indirect harnessing of listening, writing, reading and speaking skills as well as skills in the reading and analysis of thematic research papers; considered an important benefit for the thesis project.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Marcelo Bernal A., Universidad de Cuenca

Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.

Jan Feyen, Universidad de Cuenca

Dirección de Investigación de la Universidad de Cuenca (DIUC), Cuenca, Ecuador.

References

Brevik LM (2014). Making implicit practice explicit: How do upper secondary teachers describe their reading comprehension strategies instruction? International Journal of Educational Research 67:52-66

Brevick L, Olsen R, Hellekjaer G, 2016. The complexity of second language reading: Investigating the L1-L2 relationship. Reading in a Foreign Language 28(2):161-182

CES (2016). Codificado del Régimen Académico del 4 de mayo del 2016, articulo 31, p.21. Consejo de Educación Superior, Quito, Ecuador

Duke NK, Pearson PD, Strachan SL, Billman AK (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In: Samuels SJ, Farstrup AE (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (4th ed.) (pp. 51-93). Newark, NJ: International Reading Association

Feyen J (2013). How to bring research into the classroom. From “Universidad de docencia a Universidad de docencia con investigación”. PowerPoint Presentation (11 pp), Dirección de Investigación, Universidad de Cuenca

Feyen J (2016). Improving English language skills of academicians and researchers of the University of Cuenca. Dirección de Investigación de la Universidad de Cuenca (DIUC). Unpublished manuscript

Krashen S (2004). Free voluntary reading: New research, applications, and controversies. RELC Conference, Singapore, 9 pp. Available at http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/articles/ singapore.pdf

Matute VH (2005). English syllabus proposal for teaching English as a foreign language in the San Jerónimo and Antisana Private Kindergarten, Píntag. Undergraduate thesis, Applied Linguistics in English Career, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas (ESPE), Ecuador, 122 pp

Meyer L (2014). Progress Report of the Evaluation of the English Language Program at the Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador. Department of Language, Literacy & Sociocultural Studies, and Latin American Programs in Education (LAPE). College of Education, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA

Mckinley J (2010). English language writing centres in Japanese universities: What do students really need? Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal 1(1):15-30

Menezes V (2013). Second language acquisition: Reconciling theories. Graduate program in linguistic studies, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Open Journal of Applied Sciences 3:404-412

Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (2010). Kartleggingsprøve i engelsk for vg1. Veiledning [Mapping tests in English for upper secondary school year 1. A guide]. Oslo, Norway: Author

Pluck G (2013). Teaching psychology through English. Incidental improvement in academic reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Services in Psychology LXV(1):38-42

Pop A-M, Sim M-A (2013). Benefits of English Language Learning - Language proficiency certificates: A prerequisite for the business graduate. Department of International Business, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania. JEL classification: Y091, pp. 167-176. Available at http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2013/n2/016.pdf

Richard JC, Schmidt R (Eds.) (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.) London, UK: Longman, pp. 193-194

Trim J, Coste D, North B, Sheils J (2001). Gemeinsamer europäischer referenz-rahmen für sprachen: lernen, lehren, beurteilen. Berlin, Germany: Langenscheidt

Tsai J (2006). Connecting reading and writing in college EFL courses. The Internet TESL Journal XII(12). tsai.139 [-at-] osu.edu. Ohio State University (Ohio, USA). Available at http://iteslj.org/Articles/Tsai-ReadingWritingConnection.html

Downloads

Published

2017-06-20

How to Cite

Bernal A., M., & Feyen, J. (2017). A preliminary response from the Faculty of Psychology students of the University of Cuenca to the modified EFL teaching approach. Maskana, 8(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.08.01.05

Issue

Section

Research articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>