Modeling hydrological consequences of climate and land use change - Progress and Challenges

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.02.02.07

Keywords:

hydrologic modeling, climate change, land use change, research challenges, extensive literature survey

Abstract

This paper provides the state-of-the-art in hydrologic modeling regarding its capability of predicting the effects of climate and land use change on the hydrological cycle. In conclusion, the research challenges are pinpointed, which the community should address as to be able to observe and model, at a regional-scale, the coupled climate-water cycle in response to the human induced changes in climate and land use. The findings presented herein are a compilation resulting from an extensive literature review and the personal expertise of the authors. Given the focus on hydrologic modeling, many other aspects such as the best practices of integrated water resources management, cross-boundary water governance, the establishment of institutional frameworks, empowerment of local communities to participate effectively in water management and policy making, among many other very relevant aspects, were intentionally not considered as not to dilute the focus of the paper.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abbott, M.B., J.C. Bathurst, J.A. Cunge, P.E. O’Connell, J. Rasmussen, 1986. An introduction to the European System: Systeme Hydrologique Europeen (SHE). J. Hydrol., 87, 61-77.

Ambroise, B., K.J. Beven, J. Freer, 1996a. Towards a generalisation of the TOPMODEL concepts: topographic indices of hydrological similarity. Water Resour. Res., 32, 2135-2145.

Ambroise, B., J. Freer, K.J. Beven, 1996b. Application of a generalised TOPMODEL to the small Ringelbach catchment, Vosges, France. Water Resour. Res., 32, 2147-2159.

Arnold, J.G., P.M. Allen, G. Bernhardt, 1993. A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. J. Hydrol., 142, 47-69.

Bahremand, A., F. Smedt, J. Corluy, Y.B. Liu, J. Poorova, L. Velcicka, E. Kunikova, 2006. WetSpa model application for assessing reforestation impacts on floods in Margecany-Honrad watershed, Slovakia. Water Resour. Manage., 21(8)1373-1391.

Barnett, T.P., D.W. Pierce, H.G. Hidalgo, C. Bonfils, B.D. Santer, T. Das, G. Bala, A.W. Wood, T. Nozawa, A.A. Mirin, D.R. Cayan, M.D. Dettinger, 2008. Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science, 319, 1080-1083.

Bathurst, J.C., J.M. Wicks, P.E. O'Connell, 1995. The {SHE/SHESED} basin scale water flow and sediment transport modelling system. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.), Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resource Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA, 563-594.

Bergström, S., 1976. Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchtments. SMHI Report RHO 7, Norrköping, Sweden, 134 pp.

Beven, K.J., 1989. Changing ideas in hydrology. The case of physically based models. J. Hydrol., 105, 157-172.

Bhaduri, B., J.O.N. Harbor, B. Engel, M. Grove, 2008. Assessing watershed-scale, long-term hydrologic impacts of land use change using a GIS-NPS model. Sciences, 26(6), 643-658.

Bidegain, M., I. Camillloni, 2004. Performance of GCMs and climate baselines scenarios for Southeastern South America. Paper presented at Latin America & Caribbean Assessment of Impacts and Adaptation to Climate Change (AIACC) Workshop, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Binley, A.M., K.J. Beven, 1991. Physical-based modeling of catchment hydrology: a likelihood approach to reducing predictive uncertainty. In: Farmer, D.G., M.J. Rycroft (Eds.), Computer Modeling in the Environmental Sciences, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 75-88.

Bonan, G., 1997. Effects of land use on the climate of the United States. Climatic Change, 37, 449-486.

Bosch, J., J. Hewlett, 1982. A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. J. Hydrol., 55(1-4), 3-23.

Boulanger, J.-P., F. Martinez, E.C. Segura, 2006. Projection of future climate change conditions using IPCC simulations, neural networks and Bayesian statistics. Part 1: Temperature mean state and seasonal cycle in South America. Climate Dynam., 27, 233-259.

Braunschweig, F., P.C. Leitao, L. Fernandes, P. Pina, R.J.J. Neves, 2004. The object-oriented design of the integrated water modelling system MOHID. Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources (CMWR XV), Vol. 2, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 1079-1090.

Bronstert, A., D. Niehoff, G. Burger, 2002. Effects of climate and land use change on storm runoff generation : present knowledge and modeling capabilities. Hydrol. Process., 16(2), 509-529.

Brown, A.E., L. Zhang, T.A. McMahon, A.W. Western, R.A. Vertessy, 2005. A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation. J. Hydrol., 310(1-4), 28-61.

Buytaert, W., R. Célleri, L. Timbe, 2009. Predicting climate change impacts on water resources in the tropical Andes: Effects of GCM uncertainty. Geophys. Res. Letters, 36, L07406, doi: 10.1029/2008GL037048.

Calder, I.R., 1993. Hydrologic effects of land use change. In: Maidment, D.R. (Ed.), Handbook of hydrlogy, McGraw-Hill, NY, USA, 13.1-13.50.

Callow, J.N., K.R.J. Smetten, 2009. The effect of farm dams and constructed banks on hydrologic connectivity and runoff estimation in agricultural landscapes. Environ. Modell. Softw., 24(8), 959-968.

Crawford, N.H., R.K. Linsley, 1966. Digital simulation on hydrology: Stanford Watershed Model IV. Stanford University. Technical Report No. 39, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Christensen, J.H., T.R. Carter, M. Rummukainen, G. Amanatidis, 2007. Evaluating the performance and utility of regional climate models: The PRUDENCE project. Climatic Change, 81, 1-6.

Conde, C., H. Eakin, 2003: Adaptation to climatic variability and change in Tlaxcala, Mexico. In: Smith, J., R. Klein, S. Huq (Eds)., Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development. Imperial College Press, London, UK, 241-259.

Dankers, R., O.B. Christensen, L. Feyen, M. Kalas, A. de Roo, 2007. Evaluation of very high resolution climate model data for simulating flood hazards in the Upper Danube Basin. J. Hydrol., 347, 319-331.

Dankes, R., L. Feyen, 2008. Climate change impact on flood hazard in Europe: An assessment based on high-resolution climate simulations. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D19105, doi:10.1029/2007JD009719.

DeFries, R., K.N. Eshleman, 2004. Land-use change and hydrologic processes: a major focus for the future. Hydrol. Process., 18, 2183-2186.

Dehotin, J., R.F. Vázquez, I. Braud, S. Debionne, P. Viallet, 2011. Modeling of hydrological processes using unstructured and irregular grids: 2D groundwater application. J. Hydrol. Eng., 16(2), 108-125.

Downer, C.W., F.L. Ogden, 2002. GSSHA User’s manual: Gridded surface subsurface hydrologic analysis, Version 1.43 for WMS 6.1. ERDC Technical Report, Engineering Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss., USA.

Dyer, B.G., R.J. Nathan, T.A. McMahon, I.C. O’Neill, 1994. Development of regional prediction equations for the RORB runoff routing model. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Report 94/1, 93 pp.

Engel, V., E.G. Jobbagy, M. Stieglitz, M. Williams, R.B. Jackson, 2005. Hydrological consequences of Eucalyptus afforestation in the Argentine Pampas. Water Resour. Res., 41(10), 1-14.

Eslava, J.A., J.D. Pabón, 2001: Proyecto: proyecciones climáticas e impactos socioeconómicos del cambio climático en Colombia. Meteorol. Colombiana, 3, 1-8.

Fenicia, F., H.H.G. Savenije, P. Matgen, L. Pfister, 2008. Understanding catchment behavior through stepwise model concept improvement. Water Resour. Res., 44, 1-13.

Fohrer, N., S. Haverkamp, K. Eckhardt, H.G. Frede, 2001. Hydrologic response to land use changes on the catchment scale. Phys. Chem. Earth Pt B, 26(7-8), 577-582.

Fowler, H.J., M. Ekström, S. Blenkinsop, A.P. Smith, 2007. Estimating change in extreme European precipitation using a multimodel ensemble. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D18104, doi:10.1029/2007JD008619.

Freni, G., G. Mannina, G. Viviani, 2009. Urban runoff modeling uncertainty: Comparison among Bayesian and pseudo-Bayesian methods. Environ. Model. Software, 24, 1100-1111.

Goward, S., D. Williams, 1997. Landsat and Earth system science: development of terrestrial monitoring. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S., 63, 887-900.

Graham, L.P., S. Bergström, 2001. Water balance modeling in the Baltic Sea drainage basin - Analysis of meteorological and hydrological approaches. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 77, 45-60.

Graham, L.P., J. Andréasson, B. Carlsson, 2007. Assessing climate change impacts on hydrology from an ensemble of regional climate models, model scales and linking methods - A case study on the Lule River Basin. Climatic Change, 81, 293-307.

Gupta, V.K., S. Sorooshian, 1994. Calibration of conceptual hydrologic models: past, present and future. In: Council of Scientific Research Integration (Eds.), Trends in Hydrology - Research Trends, Trivandrum, India, 329-346.

Gupta, H.V., S. Sorooshian, P.O. Yapo, 1998. Towards improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and non-commensurable measures of information. Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 751-763.

Hanna, S.R., 1989. Confidence limits for air quality model evaluations, as estimated by bootstrap and jackknife resampling methods. Atmos. Environ., 23(6), 1385-1398.

Hay, L.E., M.P. Clark. 2003. Use of statistically and dynamically downscaled atmospheric model output for hydrologic simulations in three mountainous basins in the western United States. J. Hydrol., 282, 56-75.

Hornbeck, J., M. Adams, E. Corbett, E. Verry, J. Lynch, 1993. Long-term impacts of forest treatments on water yield: a summary for northeastern USA. J. Hydrol., 150(2-4), 323-344.

Houghton, R.A., 1995. Land use change and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 1, 275-287.

Hundecha, Y., A. Bardossy, 2004. Modeling the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model. J. Hydrol., 292(1-4), 281-295.

Iman, R.L., W.J. Conover, 1980. Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment. Communications in Statistics, Part A. Theory and Methods, 17, 1749-1842.

Imbeau, M.E., 1892. La Durance: Regime. Crues et inundations. Ann. Ponts Chausses Mem. Doc. Ser., 3(1), 5-18.

Ivanov, V.Y., E.R. Vivoni, R.L. Bras, D. Entekhabi, 2004. Catchment hydrologic response with a fully distributed triangulated irregular network model. Water Resour. Res., 40(11), 10.1029/2004WR003218.

Jackson, R.B., E.G. Jobbágy, M.D. Nosetto, 2009. Ecohydrology in a human-dominated landscape. Ecohydrol., 2(3), 383-389.

James, L.D., S.J. Burges, 1982. Selection, calibration and testing of hydrologic models. In: Haan, C.T. et al. (Ed.), Hydrologic modeling of small watersheds. ASAE Monograph, St. Joseph, Michigan, 437-472.

Johanson, R.C., J.C. Imhoff, J.L. Kittle, A.S. Donigan, 1984. Hydrological simulation program-Fortran (HSPF): Users Manual for Release 8.0. EPA-600/3-84-006, Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA, USA, 767 pp.

Justice, C.O., J.R.G. Townshend, E.F. Vermote, E. Masouka, R.E. Wolfe, S. Saleous, D.P. Roy, J.T. Morisette, 2002. An overview of MODIS land data processing and product status. Rem. S. Environ., 83, 3-15.

Kay, A.L., R.G. Jones, N.S. Reynard, 2006. RCM rainfall for UK flood frequency estimation. I. Method and validation, J. Hydrol., 318, 151-162.

Killeen, T.L., T. Abrajano, 2008. Understanding the triple point. Elements, 298.

Kraft, P., K.B. Vaché, H.-G. Frede, L. Breuer, 2010. A hydrological programming language extension for integrated catchment models. Environ. Model. Software, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.12.009.

Lambin, E.F., X. Baulies, N.E. Bockstael, G. Fischer, T. Krug, R. Leemans, E.F. Moran, R. Rindfuss, Y. Sato, D.L. Skole, B.L. Turner II, C. Vogel, 2002. Land-use and land-cover change implementation strategy. IGBP Report No. 48 and IHDP Report No. 10, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Lin, Y.P., N.M. Hong, P.J. Wu, C.J. Lin, 2007. Modeling and assessing land use and hydrological processes to future land use and climate change scenarios in water shed land use planning. Environ. Geol., 53(3), 623-634.

Lindblom, E., S. Ahlman, P.S. Mikkelsen, 2007. Uncertainty in model-based prediction of copper loads in stormwater runoff. Water Sci. Technol., 56(6), 11-18.

Liu, T., H. Fang, P. Willems, A.M. Bao, X. Chen, F. Veroustraete, Q.H. Dong, 2011. Historical land use analysis for the lower Tarim river region in China. Hydrol. Process. (submitted), 16 pp.

Loh, W.L., 1996. On Latin Hypercube Sampling. Annals of Statistics., 24(5),2058-2080.

Madsen, H., T. Jacobson, 2001. Automatic calibration of the MIKE SHE integrated hydrological modelling system. 4th DHI Software Conference, 6-8 June, Scanticon Conference Centre, Helsingør, Denmark.

Makropoulos, C., D. Butler, 2004. Spatial decisions under uncertainty: Fuzzy inference in urban water management, J. Hydroinform., 6(1), 3-18.

Marengo, J.A., W. Soares, C. Saulo, M. Nicolini, 2004. Climatology of the low level jet east of the Andes as derived from the NCEP NCAR re-analyses. J. Climate, 17, 2261-2280.

McColl, C., G. Aggett, 2007. Land use forecasting and hydrologic model integration for improved land use decision support. J. Environ. Manage., 84(4), 494-512.

McDonald, M.G., A.W. Harbaugh, 1988. A modular three-dimensional finite difference ground-water flow model. US Geology Survey Techniques of water-ressources investigations, Book 6.

Morris, M.D., 1991. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics, 33, 161-174.

Mulvany, T.J., 1850. On the use of self registering rain and flow gauges. Proc. Institute Civ. Eng., 4(2), 1-8.

Niehoff, D., U. Fritsch, A. Bronstert, 2002. Land use impacts on storm runoff generation: scenarios of land use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. J. Hydrol., 276(1-2), 80-93.

Nosetto, M.D., E.G. Jobbágy, T. Tóth, R.B. Jackson, 2008. Regional patterns and controls of ecosysem salinization with grassland afforestation along a rainfall gradient. Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22(2),1-12.

Nuñez M., S. Solman, M.F. Cabré, 2005. Southern South America climate in the late twenty-first century: annual and seasonal mean climate with two forcing scenarios. Taller Regional de Cambio Climático, San Pablo, Brasil.

Omlin, M., P. Reichert, 1999. A comparison of techniques for the estimation of model prediction uncertainty. Ecol. Model., 115, 45-59.

Ott, B., S. Uhlenbrook, 2004. Quantifying the impact of land use changes at the event and seasonal time scale using a process-oriented catchment model. Hydrol. Earth System Sc., 8(1), 62-78.

Pabón, J.D., I. Cárdenas, R. Kholostyakov, A.F. Calderón, N. Bernal, F. Ruiz, 2001: Escenarios climáticos para el siglo XXI sobre el territorio colombiano. Nota Técnica Interna del Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM), Bogotá, Colombia.

Palmer, M., E. Bernhardt, E. Chornesky, S. Collins, A. Dobson, C. Duke, B. Gold, R. Jacobson, S. Kingsland, R. Kranz, M. Mappin, M.L. Martinez, F. Micheli, J. Morse, M. Pace, M. Pascual, S. Palumbi, O.J. Reichman, A. Simons, A. Townsend, M. Turner, 2004. Ecology for a crowded planet. Science, 304, 1251-1252.

Parry, M.L., O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, 2007. Technical summary in climate change: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change edited by Parry, M.L., O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, C.E. Hanson, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 23-78.

Petropoulos, G., T.N. Carlson, M.J. Wooster, 2009. An overview of the use of the SimSphere Soil Vegetation Atmosphere Transfer (SVAT) Model for the study of land-atmosphere interactions. Sensors, 9, 4286-4308.

Plesca, I., E. Timbe, J.-F. Exbrayat, D. Windhorst, P. Kraft, P. Crespo, K.B. Vaché, H.-G. Frede, L. Breuer, 2011. Model intercomparison to explore catchment functioning: Results from a remote montane tropical rainforest. Ecol. Model., doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.05.005.

Poff, N.L., J.D. Olden, D. Merritt, D. Pepin, 2007. Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA, 104, 5732-5737.

Quick, M.C., A. Pipes, 1976. A combined snowmelt ana rainfall runoff model. Canad. J. Civ. Engng, 3(3), 449-460.

Refsgaard, J.C., 1997. Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. J. Hydrol., 198, 69-97.

Refsgaard, J.C., B. Storm, 1995. MIKE SHE. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.), Computer models of watershed hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA, 809-846.

Robinson, M., A.-L. Cognard-Plancq, C. Cosandey, J. David, P. Durand, H.-W. Führer, R. Hall, M.O. Hendriques, V. Marc, R. McCarthy, M. McDonnell, C. Martin, T. Nisbet, P. O’Dea, M. Rodgers, A. Zollner, 2003. Studies of the impact of forests on peak flows and baseflows: a European perspective. Forest Ecol. Manag., 186(1-3), 85-97.

Rodell, M., I. Velicogna, J.S. Famiglietti, 2009. Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India. Nature, 460, 999-1002.

Sala, O.E., F.S.I. Chapin, J.J. Armesto, E. Berlow, J. Bloomfield, R. Dirzo, E. Huber-Sanwald, L.F. Huenneke, R.B. Jackson, A. Kinzig, R. Leemans, D.M. Lodge, H.A. Mooney, M. Oesterheld, N.L. Poff, M.T. Sykes, B.H. Walker, D.H. Wall, 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287, 1770-1774.

Sanderson, E.W., M. Jaitech, M.A. Levy, K.H. Redford, A.V. Wannebo, G. Woolmer, 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience, 52, 891-904.

Savenije, H.H.G., 2009. The art of hydrology. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 157-161.

Scanlon, B.R., K.E. Keese, A.L. Flint, L.E. Flint, C.B. Gaye, M. Edmunds, I. Simmers, 2006. Global synthesis of groundwater recharge in semiarid and arid regions. Hydrol. Process., 20, 3335-3370.

Sellers, P.J., Y. Mintz, Y.C. Sud, A. Dalcher, 1986. A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models. J. Atmosph. Sci., 43, 505-531.

Singh, V.P. (Ed.), 1995. Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resource Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA.

Solman, S., M. Nuñez, M.F. Cabré, 2005. Escenarios regionales de cambio climático sobre el Sur de Sudamérica. Taller Regional de Cambio Climático, San Pablo, Brasil.

Steffen, W., J. Jager, D.J. Carson, C. Bradshaw (Eds.), 2003. Challenges of a changing earth. Series: Global Change, The IGBP Series, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.

Stehlik, J., A. Bárdossy, 2002. Multivariate stochastic downscaling model for generating daily precipitation series based on atmospheric circulation. J. Hydrol., 256, 120-141.

Stein, M., 1987. Large sample properties of simulations using Latin Hypercube Sampling. Technometrics, 29(2), 143-151.

Sugawara, M., 1995. Tank model. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.). Computer models of watershed hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA, 165-214.

Tang, Z., B.A. Engel, P.C. Pijanowski, K.J. Lim, 2005. Forecasting land use change and its environmental impact at a watershed scale. J. Environ. Manage., 76(1), 35-45.

Tetsuya, S., 2004. The Earth Simulator: Roles and Impacts. Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplements, 129, 102.

Todini, E., 1996. The ARNO rainfall-runoff model. J. Hydrol., 175, 339-382.

Tong, S.T.Y., A.J. Liu, 2006. Modelling the hydrologic effects of land use change and its environmental impact at a watershed scale. J. Environ. Manage., 76(1), 35-45.

Van Griensven, A., T. Meixner, S. Grunwald, T. Bishop, M. Diluzio, R. Srinivasan, 2006, A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable watershed. J. Hydrol., 324, 10-23.

Varis, O., T. Kajander, R. Lemmela, 2004. Climate and water: From climate models to water resources management and vice versa. Climatic Change, 66, 321-344.

Vázquez, R.F., J. Feyen, 2003. Effect of potential evapotranspiration estimates on effective parameters and performance of the MIKE SHE-code applied to a medium-size catchment. J. Hydrol, 270(4), 309-327.

Vázquez, R.F., P. Willems, J. Feyen, 2008. Improving the predictions of a MIKE SHE catchment-scale application by using a multi-criteria approach. Hydrol. Process., 22(13), 2159-2179.

Vázquez, R.F., K. Beven, J. Feyen, 2009. GLUE based assessment on the overall predictions of a MIKE SHE application. Water Resour. Manage., 23(7), 1325-1349.

Vázquez, R.F., L. Feyen, J. Feyen, J.C. Refsgaard, 2002. Effect of grid-size on effective parameters and model performance of the MIKE SHE code applied to a medium sized catchment. Hydrol. Process., 16(2), 355-372.

Verburg, P.H., W. Soepboer, A. Veldkamp, R. Limpiada, V. Espaldon, S.S. Mastura, 2002. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model. Environ. Manage., 30(3), 391-405.

Verburg, P.H., T. Veldkamp, K. Overmars, J.P. Lesschen, K. Kok, 2004. Manual for CLUE-S model. Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Vidal, J-P., S.D. Wade, 2008. Multimodel projections of catchment-scale precipitation regime. J. Hydrol., 353, 143-158.

Vivoni, E.R., V.Y. Ivanov, R.L. Bras, D. Entekhabi, 2004. Generation of triangulated irregular networks based on hydrologic similarity. J. Hydrol. Eng., 9, 288-302.

Wagener, T., M. Sivapalan, B.L. McGlynn, 2008. Catchment classification and services. Toward a new paradigm for catchment hydrology driven by societal needs. In: Anderson, M.G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences, John Wiley, Chichester, UK.

Wagener, T., M. Sivapalan, P.A. Troch, B.L. McGlynn, C.J. Harman, H.V. Gupta, P. Kumar, P.S.C. Rao, N.B. Basu, J.S. Wilson, 2010. The future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world. Water Resour. Res., 46, 1-10.

Wang, S.F., S.Z. Kang, L. Zhang, F.S. Li, 2008. Modelling hydrological response to different land use and climate change scenarios in the Zamu River basin of northwest China. Hydrol. Process., 22(14), 2502-2510.

Wei, H., M.A. Nearing, J.J. Stone, 2007. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis framework for model evaluation and improvement using a case study of the Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model. Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 945-953.

White, K.L., I. Chaubey, 2005. Sensitivity analysis, calibation, and validations for a multisite and multivariable SWAT model. J. Amer. Water Resourc. Assoc., 1077-1089.

Wilby, R.L., C.W. Dawson, E.M. Barrow, 2002. SDSM - a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts. Environ. Modell. Softw., 17, 147-159.

Xu, C.-yu, E. Widén, S. Halldin, 2005. Modeling hydrological consequences of climate change: Progress and Challenges. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 22(6), 789-797.

Yapo, P.O., H.V. Gupta, S. Sorooshian, 1998. Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models. J. Hydrol., 204, 83-97.

Young, P., 2003. Top-down and data-based mechanistic modelling of rainfall-flow dynamics at the catchment scale. Hydrol. Process., 17, 2195-2217.

Zhao, R.J., Y.L. Zhang, L.R. Fang, 1980. The Xinanjiang model. Hydrological Forecasting Proceedings Oxford Symposium, IASH, 129, 351-356.

Downloads

Published

2011-12-25

How to Cite

Feyen, J., & Vázquez, R. (2011). Modeling hydrological consequences of climate and land use change - Progress and Challenges. Maskana, 2(2), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.02.02.07

Issue

Section

Research articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >> 

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.