An analysis of the relationship between higher education performance and socio-economic and technological indicators: The Latin American case study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.04.02.01Keywords:
higher education institutes, reseach intensity, scientific productivity, country ranking, Latin AmericaAbstract
This paper reports on a study that analyzed the research output of higher education systems in a select number of Latin American countries and its relationship to several socio-economic and technological success indicators. This was placed within a broader discussion of the changing role of the university in society. The study used the rankings of the countries surveyed with respect to two major indicators: 1. higher education and training (Global Competiveness Report 2012-2013) and 2. scientific productivity of higher education institutions (HEI) as measured by the number of research papers published in international, peer reviewed journals as archived in the Scopus Database (Elsevier B.V.) and available in the SIR Iberoamericano Ranking Reports 2009-2013. The relationship of both indicators with various socio-economic and technology indicators was examined to assess the extent to which the quality and scientific productivity of a country’s higher education system affected a number of country performance indices such as global competitiveness, innovation, health and primary education, government effectiveness, knowledge and technology output and GDP per capita. The relationship between scientific productivity in the form of published, refereed papers and a country’s investment in R&D, researcher headcount per million inhabitants and the quality of its research institutes was analyzed as well. The findings at the Latin American level were compared to the research effectiveness of higher education institutes at the global level. The study found that, notwithstanding the huge variation that existed between the countries studied in the survey, the education and training country rank and the country average HEI publication record correlates with several important socio-economic indicators. Although improvements have been made many Latin American countries still trail their global counterparts in the area of research and publication.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ahmed, A., I. Abdallah, 2013. Transforming the United Arab Emeritates into a knowledged-based economy. World J. Sci. Technol. Sustain. Devel., 10(2), 84-102.
Bartlett, P.F., G.W. Chase, 2004. Sustainability on campus. Cambridge, MIT Press, 121-137.
Brundtland, G.H., P. Ehrlich, J. Goldemberg, J. Hansen, A. Lovins, G. Likens, J. Lovelock, S. Manabe, B. May, H. Mooney, K-H. Robert, E. Salim, G. Sato, S. Solomon, N. Stern, M.S. Swaminathan, B. Watson, 2012. Environment and development challenges: The imperative to Act. Retrieved from www.unep.org/pdf/pressreleases/Blue_Planet_synthesis_paper.pdf on May 1, 2013, 23 pp.
Chen, D.H.C., C.J. Dahlman, 2005. The knowledge economy, the KAM methodology and World Bank Operations. Knowledge for Development (K4D), The World Bank. Retrieved from http://web.worldbank.org/ on September 17, 2013, 35 pp.
Ciferri, L., P. Lombardi, 2009. The role of university education in fostering sustainable and responsible development. In: Brandon, P., P. Lombardi (Eds.), Evaluating sustainable development in the built environment. Politecnico di Torino, Publisher Blackwell-Wiley, 9 pp.
Di Gregorio, D., S. Shane, 2003. Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Res. Policy, 32, 209-227.
Dragos, C.M., S.L. Dragos, 2013. Bibliometric approach of factors affecting scientific productivity in environmental sciences and ecology. Sci. Total Environ., 449, 184-188.
Ferrari, C., N. Contreras, 2008. Universidades en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad, 218, 23-38.
Lakitan, B., D. Hidayat, S. Herlinda, 2012. Scientific productivity and the collaboration intensity of Indonesian universities and public R&D institutions: Are there dependencies on collaborative R&D with foreign institutions? Technol. Soc., 34(3), 227-238.
Lélé, S., 1991. Sustainable development: a critical review. World Development,19(6), 607-621.
Lemarchand, G.A., 2012. The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks: Iberoamerican countries (1973-2010). Res. Policy, 41(2), 291-305.
Li, X., 2012. R&D intensity and productivity of exporting SMEs: empirical evidence from China. IJLIC, 9(1/2), 86-97.
Marginson, S., 2010. Higher education in the global knowledge economy. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 2, 6962-6980.
Nuchwana, L., 2012. How to link teaching and research to enhance students’ learning outcomes: Thai University Experience. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 69, 213-219.
OECD, 2011. Public and business research and development expenditure: Americas 2007. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/reg_glance-2011-en/ on May 12, 2013.
Ortega, C.B., A.G. Marín, 2008. Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity: a country-level study. Central Bank of Chile: Working Papers, N° 472, 51 pp.
Paus, E.A., 2004. Productivity growth in Latin America: The limits of neoliberal reforms. World Dev., 32(3), 427-445.
Ponomariov, B.L., P. C. Boardman, 2010. Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Res. Policy, 39(5), 613-624.
Prados, J.W., G.D. Peterson, L.R. Lattuca, 2005. Quality Assurance of engineering education through accreditation: The impact of engineering criteria 2000 and its global influence. J. Eng. Educ., 94(1), 165-184.
Rajendran, C.P., 2010. Challenges in Earth sciences: the 21st century. Science, 99(12), 1690-1698.
Rauhvargers, A., 2011. Global university rankings and their impact. EUA Report on Rankings 2011, European University Association, Brussels, Belgium, 85 pp.
Rhoades, G., B. Sporn, 2002. Quality assurance in Europe and the US: Professional and political economic framing of higher education policy. High. Educ., 43(3), 355-390.
Schwab, K., 2012. The Global Competitiveness Report 2012-2013. World Economic Forum - Geneva Switzerland. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2012-2013/#= on May 5, 2013, 549 pp.
Scott, P., 1998. Massification, internationalization and globalization. In: Scott, P. (ed.). The Globalization of Higher Education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education / Open University Press, pp.108-129.
Steffen, W., P.J. Crutzen, J.R. McNeill, 2007. The anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio, 36(8), 614-621.
The Group of Eight, 2013. The role and importance of research intensive universities in the contemporary world. The Group of Eight, Group of Eight House, Level 2, 101 Northbourne Av., Turner ACT 2612, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.go8.edu.au/ on May 12, 2013, 12 pp.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2009. A global perspective on Science and Technology (S&T): Country profiles. Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org/ScienceTechnology/Pages/ default.aspx on April 18, 2013.
Vörösmarty, C.J., P. Green, J. Salisbury, R.B. Lammers, 2000. Global Water Resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science, 289(5477), 284-288.
Waas, T., A. Verbruggen, T. Wright, 2010. University research for sustainable development: definition and characteristics explored. J. Clean. Prod., 18, 629-636.
Wright, T., 2004. The evolution of environmental sustainability declarations in higher education. In: Wals, A., P. Corcoran (eds. Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: problematics, promise, and practice. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 7-19.
Zahlan, B., 2007. Higher education, R&D, economic development, regional and global interface. UNESCO FORUM on higher education, research and knowledge. Paper presented at the 2nd Regional Research Seminar for Arab States, Rabat, Morocco, 13 pp.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © Autors. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. for any article submitted from 6 June 2017 onwards. For manuscripts submitted before, the CC BY 3.0 License was used.
You are free to:
 |
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format |
 |
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. |
Under the following conditions:
 |
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licenser endorses you or your use. |
| No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the licence permits. |
